a personal private one to one drivers awareness course. or whether she was asking essentially to act on her behalf as a private rather than government minister, that s the crux of the problem and she would not answer that question repeatedly. in the meantime we re told rishi sunak, we saw him chatting about the g7 summits, something he wants to talk about, with his ethics adviser sir laurie magnus, it is not clear whether an investigation is going to be carried out into that potential breach of the rule book for the ministers by suella braverman. mat ministers by suella braverman. not what he wanted to face upon his return from the g7 at all as you say. it return from the g7 at all as you sa . . , , , , ., say. it was the very first question last niuht say. it was the very first question last night and say. it was the very first question last night and she say. it was the very first question last night and she looked - say. it was the very first question l last night and
opposite number, her opposite number yvette cooper pointed out this is not the first time potentially suella braverman has broken the ministerial code. she resigned from liz truss s government for using private e mail for public government communication and social has got a track record here and of course rishi sunak has lost other ministers, most recently dominic raab, although he disagreed with the conclusions of the inquiry into allegations of bullying against him, he said he was a man of his word because there was that breach of the ministerial code they had no choice but to resign and certainly if suella braverman were found to have broken the ministerial code she too would have to resign, i think it would have to resign, i think it would be difficult for her to stay on. the question therefore rishi sunak is whether or not we have this investigation. he is the ultimate arbiter of that rule book for ministers on the one hand i think she would quite like to keep suella braverman aro
speeding. i was notified of the was speeding. i was notified of the matter. i paid define and i took the points. at no point did anything untoward happen and at no point did i try and avoid the sanction. home secretary suella i try and avoid the sanction. home secretary suella braverman - secretary suella braverman responding to questions in the commons about her dealing with a speeding fine in the summer of last year. live to westminster and our political correspondent. she repeatedly failed to answer the question as to whether she approached several servants. she would not approached several servants. sue: would not deviate from the script at all which the home secretary suella braverman you said i hope this does not get repetitive and it did get repetitive. why this matters as although it s embarrassing for the person is the home secretary is in charge of law and order to pay a speeding fine, it is the question whether she broke the rule book for ministers which is what everyone i
a personal private one to one drivers awareness course. or whether she was asking essentially to act on her behalf as a private rather than government minister, that s the crux of the problem and she would not answer that question repeatedly. in the meantime we re told rishi sunak, we saw him chatting about the g7 summits, something he wants to talk about, with his ethics adviser sir laurie magnus, it is not clear whether an investigation is going to be carried out into that potential breach of the rule book for the ministers by suella braverman. mat ministers by suella braverman. not what he wanted to face upon his return from the g7 at all as you say. it return from the g7 at all as you sa . . , , , , ., say. it was the very first question last niuht say. it was the very first question last night and say. it was the very first question last night and she say. it was the very first question last night and she looked - say. it was the very first question l last night and she looked
though, to accusations from his political opponents i m sure of being too weak to act. the context is the role she being too weak to act. the context is the role she was being too weak to act. the context is the role she was in being too weak to act. the context is the role she was in at being too weak to act. the context is the role she was in at the - being too weak to act. the context is the role she was in at the time, | is the role she was in at the time, and lady who is a former barrister and lady who is a former barrister and she should have, could have consulted lawyers and we are not sure whether she did or not. she was attorney general sure whether she did or not. she was attorney general at sure whether she did or not. she was attorney general at the sure whether she did or not. she was attorney general at the time, - sure whether she did or not. she was attorney general at the time, chief. attorney general at the time, chief law officer in the uk. now home sec