which turned out to be not be bad idea i mean, yeah, really. there are good investment you will see in this job? you have to cover a lot of the person who sometimes you get little moments of levity. when someone told me on my staff that steve bannon ha been apprehended by postal service inspectors on the yach of a chinese billionaire i connecticut, i was like, okay. this is one of the good stories. yes you enjoy that, all the way home, my friend. thank you at-home for joinin us this hour in december it was about parental rights. a federal judge in texas ruled that a grant program designe to provide birth control t kids from low income familie was unconstitutional because that program violated parental rights the judge wrote, the court finds no compelling government interest justifies dependenc disregard of plaintiff parental rights in this case in november, it was abou discrimination on the basis of sex. that same federal judge signed with lawyers associated with
senator, in working in th private government and nonprofit sector, i can recall an instance where i observed a judge imposing th religion but i will say for the recor that it is inappropriate for a article three judge to do so that was the response, give by the man who in the coming days will decide a case that could up and access to one o the drugs used in medication abortions nationwide a conservative group calle alliance defending freedom brought a case against the fda in november to challenge the agency s approval of the abortion drug nif crestone an approval that happened more than two decades ago that group much like the judge overseeing the case ha interesting backstory. it is the group founded in the conservation lawyers it has history of failed lawsuits targeting transgender student athletes lawyers for the group also argued in favor of criminalizing homosexuality in supreme court amicus briefs.
sympathetic to the challenge brought by alliance defendin freedom. offering the plaintiffs more windows than the defense t clarify and elaborate on their arguments. but he also asked th plaintiffs if they could offer another example of a drug with long-standing approval being pulled from the shelves. they said no in the and you told lawyers, both sides presented a stron case and he would make a decision as soon as possible but both sides could continu to submit relevant examples of case law in the days and weeks to come. so it might not be long before we know how this judge wil rule his decision could be the en of mifepristone, it could be a more narrow injunction on it availability it could be none of the above. but it is a perilous time fo women who are concerned abou access to reproductive choice. and this is not just about women and pregnant people in texas. this is about people acros this country and states like colorado and georgia and pennsylvania and vermont and several others