I dont know about you, but the trial is fascinating! While the outcome is more-or-less predetermined, it is fantastic that the entire world has an opportunity to observe our government in real time.
you heard hirono saying and based on what she knows and his credibility were already questioned in my miend. he has yet to be questioned on this specific incident in front of the judiciary committee. how is this proceed on capitol hill? it is being perceived this way. you just played a clip of nicky hailey saying the goal is to get to the truth. that s not how it is perceived in terms of what the republicans are doing. if you want to get to the truth, you want to hear from other people. you don t want to present this is what he says and he says and we ll leave it at that. that s not how we get to the truth and for lindsey graham, that s the process you would use or any other form. that s not true. i was a prosecutor for many years. you don t rely the accused or the accuser. the most important evidence is the hands of other people.
you bring them and you hear what they have to say and you send investigators out to talk to them and telling this other witness judge is willing to speak publicly but not willing to speak under oath. we should try to get to the truth. you can t get there if you are not going to allow any other external evidence other than these two witnesses. what nicky hailey is saying, it is clear on the hill for the republicans to get to the confirmation and that s what matters. that s what s jumping most of you of all this of the politi l politicalization of what this is, is that what for most in your mind of how this is all playing out? what s in my mind is there are serious allegations of judge kavanaugh commitmeted attempted
the 25th amendment or never has anyone questioned the president s memo stability or anything. u.s. ambassador nikki haley. her response coming on the hill of that explosive new york times on rosenstein that we ignited questions of internal questions of the trump s administration. rosenstein discussed the recording of president trump of the 25th amendment. let s bring in our howard dean and our msnbc contributor and our political analyst. hey guys. good to see you both. hi. howard, we heard different speeches on that rosenstein article. they thought rosenstein was being sarcastic but he was joking when he recorded the president. what s your interpretation? well, first of all, one of
disentangle of what s good for trump and what s good for america. he can t really see when he s doing something that s beneficial for him. he cannot see the damage that s causing to the country as a whole. mika, the most interesting take the four people that voted for trump are still with trump and even one of them they ll vote for him again. they said they would vote for him again in the general but caveats. every single one. i said what if mike pence or nicky hailey ran neagainst him the primary, which was interesting, you would not gotten that with barack obama of 18 months or george w. bush