Families are sprinting at the moment. In itu settings. It is the correct strategy to do this. Face to quickset whiter things other than purely disease focused things but at the moment, i would clear advice is to stick to those nine priority groups from a jcvi perspective. Priority groups from a jcvi perspective priority groups from a jcvi perspective. Priority groups from a jcvi ersective. ,. , perspective. There is much more i would like perspective. There is much more i would like to perspective. There is much more i would like to ask perspective. There is much more i would like to ask you, perspective. There is much more i would like to ask you, perhaps perspective. There is much more i would like to ask you, perhaps we j would like to ask you, perhaps we will have you back very soon. It is certainly good to talk to you this afternoon, thank you very much. Now on bbc news its time for the film review. Hello and welcome to the film review with me mark kermode reminding you that while
Then will jump right in. Scott here no interest in giving a speech before mr. Asking questions. What you start asking questions. There we go. Just in time for thanksgiving. A book to help you deal with people with whom you disagree. Everyone, get out and get your copy. Gavel, intro, questions. Please send yours up. They dont have to be related to just the book. Here weit go. My name is melissa caen. Welcome to the Commonwealth Club hosting of the scott adams. In his new book loserthink scott dison did epidemic of mental shortcuts that he believes is making as prone to believing in bad ideas. Racist,g that gun control is equal to full compensation and most importantly avoiding self reflection join personal relationships and period were very excited to have him here with us tonight to discuss his new book. Loser thing. And whatever else you guys would like to ask him. He has told me that that thing is loft offlimits for so they go. Please welcome scott adams. [applause] loser say is the
Hello and welcome to. Involving at a cost make and Artificial Intelligence no longer just a hollywood dream as a path ahead of us a dangerous one will our lives be real while im here in the universities all this questions to one of the most prominent thinkers in this field nick bostrom. Its really great to have you with us a year a philosopher a year author who writes about whats going to happen to us basically possibly. So one of the ideas that you put forward is this idea of vulnerable world yes so correct me if i were wrong but if i get this correctly its its basically that humanity may come up with a technology that may do this to extension and therefore we would need computer surveillance while that might be an oversimplification but the vulnerable world hypothesis. Is the hypothesis that at some level of Technological Development it gets to be said to destroy 6 basic things so that by default one civilization reaches the level of development. Will get that a stated. And there are
Choice trump. Joins us as we try to find one of the to. Hello and welcome to. Technology involving at a cost make and Artificial Intelligence no longer just a hollywood dream as a path ahead of us a dangerous one will our lives still be a real while im here in Oxford University to ask all these questions to one of the most prominent bankers in this field nick bostrom. Nick. Its really great to have you with us youre a philosopher youre author who writes about whats going to happen to us basically possibly so one of the ideas that you put forward is this idea of vulnerable world yes so correct me if i were wrong but if i get this correctly its its basically that humanity may come up with a technology that may do this to extension and therefore we would need computer surveillance while that might be an oversimplification but the vulnerable world hypothesis. Is the hypothesis that at some level of Technological Development it gets to be said to destroy 6 basic things so that by default on
Surveillance but you want know that it is detrimental and something has gone wrong that the fact of surveillance wouldnt really prevent well so if if one thinks that the world at some level of technology is vulnerable in this sense one can then obviously wants to ask well what could we possibly do in that situation to prevent the world from actually getting destroyed and it does look like insurgents in our us. Ubiquitous surveillance would be the only thing that could possibly prevent that. And now would even that work well i mean pads on the specifics of this narrow so youd have to think just how easy would it be to cause destruction would you just snap your finger or say like a magic world the world blows up well then maybe surveillance wouldnt suffice but suppose its something that takes several weeks and you have to you know do build something in your apartment and maybe require some skill you know at that point. You could imagine a very fine grained. Surveillance infrastructure ha