i m not giving up that global cooperation will happen because it s very hard, particularly for lower-income countries to stop these things without the world working cooperatively. looking for silver linings, one of the things you talk about, which i thought was really interesting is the clearly the pandemic causes a lot of mental health issues, distress and things like that. but you point out that this is an area where digitization has actually provided a surprising kind of upside or solution. explain. so the idea of video conferencing is very much a niche thing, even though it s
pennies and sometimes nothing. competition is good. how do you make sure start-up can compete with big players. that should be the focus. consumers love these services and make sure it s competitive markets. that s not necessarily jumping immediately to a break-up scenario. jedediah: when you founded aol, i m just curious. did you see it playing out this way? yes and no. when we started it back in 1985 only 3% of people were online. those 3% were online just an hour of week. still pretty. steve: it was dial up. it was expensive. goes back to the competition. it was expensive. steve: tie up phone line. $10 an hour to be online. of course you won t be online. now it s so ubiquitous and can t live without the internet. great toe so it. some issues now so pervasive with platforms like facebook and others. how you make sure all voices are heard. make sure there is quality control out there. gone from niche thing that nobody cared about to being such an essential part of
a lot of people are saying they are doing this for seed money. the boston globe writes, despite town halls packed by admirers, there looks more fragile, especially with these interests, her biggest problems is the credibility deficit that connects back to the controversy over her ethnicity. this comes days after the berkshire eagle, a paper up there says, just get a dna test. settle this once and for all. i do agree that the pocahontas stuff is a substantial liability for elizabeth warren. the larger liability for elizabeth warren is elizabeth warren. people don t seem to connect i have always found her to be sort of like a democrat s ted cruz. excites a core group of supporters who really, really like her, then has trouble with broader appeal, so it becomes a niche thing. the democratic field is going to be enormously crowded. going to be even bigger in 2016.
a lot of people are saying they are doing this for seed money. the boston globe writes, despite town halls packed by admirers, there looks more fragile, especially with these interests, her biggest problems is the credibility deficit that connects back to the controversy over her ethnicity. this comes days after the berkshire eagle, a paper up there says, just get a dna test. settle this once and for all. i do agree that the pocahontas stuff is a substantial liability for elizabeth warren. the larger liability for elizabeth warren is elizabeth warren. people don t seem to connect i have always found her to be sort of like a democrat s ted cruz. excites a core group of supporters who really, really like her, then has trouble with broader appeal, so it becomes a niche thing. the democratic field is going to be enormously crowded. going to be even bigger in 2016.
that. in my community as well. i have business to consider. to put myself in front is not something i was looking to do. but you know what this movement really suggests is that it s not about an interest group. you were discussing it before. it s about principles and values. really, that is if you look throughout history and how they engage the political process, it s a niche thing they want taken care of. civil rights or women s suffrage movement. this is a movement but not in traditional sense. governed by reason and principle to carry us throughout the generations. when you engage the political process based on principles and values clearly defined then you can truly make a difference. [ applause ] well said. glenn: back in just a second. who need