white working class voters. but what is his path forward in the primary? well, in my new podcast, we release our nice plug. nice plug. you re allowed. we re releasing our power five today. i have him at five. he s authentic. voters think he s real and relatable. a crisp, coherent message that he believes in and has been honing for years. i think he ll play well in iowa and new hampshire and the early states. and i think he won ohio in 2018. great year for dems. not such a great year for ohio democrats. so he s won in a trump state. and so he brings a lot to the table. he s going to be formissable. name i.d. will be an issue for him but it s an issue for everyone. thank you for being with us. ayesha and shannon, stick around. we want to talk about, have you been outside yet? maybe just don t. i have on leggings, pants, two jackets.
he thinks people shouldn t have done it. you have some responsibility, if you really want to make a statement, stand up and say it with your name attached to it. i will say i don t get your point about woodward s book. seems to me he is highly credible. whereas in the omarosa case, you can say. or even in the michael wolff case, you could say i don t know. but in this case, this guy s a veteran journalist with one unbelievable track record. what he says is this president is detached from reality. greg: i guess my point is he realized the new york times dropped this. dana: i think it helps him. controversy helps drive books. he s going to be doing a ton of interviews. i m going to have one with him wednesday on the daily briefing show. i have learned from the master. greg: nice plug. dana: thank you. one of the things that helps people, if they have a look out, there s too many books
these things. i think one of the most interesting speeches today was ben sasse, senator ben sasse who basically gave a schoolhouse rock of the three branches of government, and the role of the legislature is supposed to play. article one of the constitution. he s going to be on the show tonight and we re going to ask him about all that. greg: nice plug. jesse: i believe we have dana perino up and ready. dana: hi, guys. jesse: i know you have a lot of inside sources over there on capitol hill. what are you hearing? who do you feel won? did the republicans think they had a good day or did the democrats think because they created all this drama, did the democrats feel like they scored big at today s hearing? dana: the republicans think they are playing a longer game. the reason we have these hearings is, as bret said, it s part of the process.
racial identity as your own, or when you went to work with your natural hair without comments or questions from others. a friend said that particular last one seemed like it was kind of almost unfairly directed toward one minority group and then that started a conversation apparently at that particular starbucks. i was talking about this on my instagram and i encourage everybody to join me there. nice plug. look, i m going to plug. i m going to self promote. certainly. from what you ve just read, i can tell what people were certainly uncomfortable with this conversation. there are some legitimate issues to be discussed. putting things out there, there is potential for people to be biased against you if you feel a particular way about how you deal with your colleagues, whether they be those are conversations that necessarily
when you went to work with your natural hair without comments or questions from others. a friend said that particular last one seemed like it was kind of almost unfairly directed toward one minority group and then that started a conversation apparently at that particular starbucks. i was talking about this on my instagram and i encourage everybody to join me there. nice plug. look, i m going to plug. i m going to self promote. certainly. from what you ve just read, i can tell what people were certainly uncomfortable with this conversation. there are some legitimate issues to be discussed. putting things out there, there is potential for people to be biased against you if you feel a particular way about how you deal with your colleagues, whether they be those are conversations that necessarily should be had in a group setting of three or four people and reviewed by other folks.