that? it is hard to say who the sources are for the new y times. once the documents start floating around d.c., it is a case of a trump lawyer who wrote that passed it an lolong to a fd for review and the friend gives it up to the new york times. leaves a couple months to a trail tied back to them. when i get a good tip from someone. they say wait a couple days. once the information starts circulating, it will not look like it came from me. that s a standard journalism practice. in the letter, the president acknowledged dictating the response of the don junior meeting with the russians. we will talk about that in the next segment. bill clinton says impeachment proceedings could have already begun if a democrat was president.
entering into dialogue over cuba, for entering into dialogue with the iranians who previously suggested doing that with north korea would be a terrible mistake. now he seems to be happy to do it. that s okay with me. i think dialogue is a good idea, but it does raise the questions of, boy, what are your views, actually? if they re as bellicose as they have been in the past, that gets kind of scary. i m not quite as willing as john is to let him off the hook about the served during the gulf war versus served in the gulf war business. it s certainly true that nobody is responsible for what other people say about them, and if other people misspeak, you re not obligated to correct it every single time. on the other hand, when over a period of many, many years in multiple buy iographies, new y times articles, letters backing him by 15 members of congress and so on, a mistruth about your record is repeatedly stated, at