generational statement and make the turn, he has to say no. he has to stand up to big oil and show the american people that big oil doesn t get all it wants. he has to protect the aquifer. he has to keep the town of mayflower, arkansas in mind when he is making this decision. there is another thing to take under consideration in this part of the country if we look at the map. where is the next pipeline going to go? if they have the pipeline approved and the keystone comes over the aquifer, what other pipeline will be stopped in america? this would set a precedent because everybody would say, on the oil side of things, hey, we already have a pipeline going over the aquifer. as a matter of fact, they do right now. when i was in nebraska, that is the case they were making. oh, ed, don t worry about it. we have the first keystone over the aquifer. we have no problems.
pits in alberta. we need to leave it there. all right. michael, we highlighted the issue in mayflower, arkansas, that spill. what if that happened over the aquifer? the impact would be enormous. ed, let me take a second to applaud your change of heart on this. it takes a lot of courage for someone to take a step back and look at the facts and talk to real people about the impacts of this decision. i appreciate that. you are very kind. this is not about me. this is about the 65% of the people in this country who want this. i was in there. i do believe that the lack of media coverage on all the networks and all the newspapers don t talk about the issues that you were talking about or any of the other owe poen ends to this. on the jobs to the environmental impact to the land rights to the
donations. it was great big presents to the family. basically paying for the daughter s wedding. which by the way is shocking for those of us who live outside of virginia that that is allowed to happen. but that s the statute. you can basically give anything to anyone. interesting state laws is where they re going after him. don t to get the supreme court took away one of the federal government s biggest tools in prosecuting public officials when theyen valid the i don t understand of services act which allowed federal prosecutors to go after politicians who were accused of denying the public of honest services. a couple more stories forget the to here. i want to get to the nsa story. americans without health coverage, this is interesting, appear to be more reticent than the white house originally thought. a poll found 53% of those without coverage disapprove of the health care law. that s slightly higher than the
that s what everybody looks like. i think the point, jim, that you raise is a good one. if this is the strategy, the kind of strategy behind promoting and marketing this law, this is not a good time for democrats. one of the most flawed rollouts in the history of man kind. but you were talking about the poll numbers, the fact this they don t get young people to have this conversation and to sign up for health care, you re going to have problems. they re having problems in every state. heck, they re having problems in massachusetts where the federal mandates are now clashing with the state model that will this entire bill was built on, this law was built upon. and if those newspapers don t start to crank up in early next year and you don t see healthy young people under the age of 30 signing up for health insurance, there will be much bigger problems. i think showing somebody who has been completely destroyed in a car wreck is probably a better
in utah you can carry in a concealed gun. nra is greg: no, no. they are talking about the officers which is why the crime dropped in new york city schools they have a school safety program with police officers there. greg: i m not sure that it follows the same program or pattern as new york. bob: not like new york. you come back to chicago but these are gang-drug related wars in chicago. kimberly: so is it okay? he is not doing a good job. bob: it s the drug wars. eric: so are you saying don t arm them?