point when these other organizations, cnn, abc, nbc, new york times, politco, will have to grabble with this. i bet this story line will be well, conservatives are pushing this. but again, it s in court documents and it s a very different standard. actually pretexts a newspaper organization from liable. it s not that difficult. report what the prosecutor says he found and see what happens. martha: you think about the bungled water gate burglarly to put a phone tap-in. and i encourage people to read this about the tech executive that had access to the servers and using the access that he has through his job to tap to people that decides to take a look at and an indication that it could be wider than that. thank you very much. good to see you. martha: howie, don t go away. another question for you. we re just covering something that is breaking moments ago.
only 15% of their subscribers received the saturday edition of their printed paper. that actually extended deeper into the newspaper offices when folks tried to call the l.a. times to inquire about where their paper was. the phone lines were on the fri fritz. there was no customer service to be had. we have heard about similar attacks. they ve happened to home computers, hospitals, global shipping companies. this new experience for a newspaper organization, the real irony here for some is to think a digital bug could be responsible. there is real concern for the effectiveness of this attack. is there any way to confirm that a foreign cyber hacker was potentially behind this? you know, again, in a situation like this, tracking who specifically was responsible for it is incredibly difficult.