time for tonight s rewrite. rupert murdoch has a character witness. he s a very honorable, honest man. this can t be something he would have anything to do with. well, that wraps it up, i guess. case closed. i mean, a former u.s. attorney comes out and says you re clean, you re clean, right? let s see the rest of that interview about murdoch. as you know, news of the world owned by rupert murdoch who is a friend and supporter of yours for a long time, there are now allegations that news corp journalists and those working for news corp tried to hack into the answering machines or the phones of 9/11 victims or their families. should there be an investigation? there is an investigation i m sure. intercepting a communication like that is a crime. it has to be investigated. i think what there shouldn t be and we ve learned recently with
of news corp. journalists across the world, making the case immediately the isolated of the crime makes it key of the importance. free floating nation state that operates by its own rules that roams off corners wherever it can. it takes regulatory and tax average of whatever jurisdiction it operates in. for the most part, those of us who cover the story have admired their aggression and ability to win over and over. it was assumed that they colored on the line not just outside the line. the illusion that mr. murdoch will get whatever he wants, the times at london, whether it s the wall street journal has been blown away. there s a kind of at least in britain, a british thing underway where nobody would ever
was like. i would like to say one sentence. this is the most humble day of my life. reporter: he also said that he had no knowledge of the phone hacking that had gone on at news of the world. beyond the cases that were wrapped up in 2009, nor any hacking by news corp journalists into the phones of 9/11 victims. as far as we know, the fbi haven t sitar. reporter: the bottom line is rupert her doc rupert murdocn james who was based in london at the time. often rupert murdoch tried to defer to james. but they both said they were terribly sorry for any wrongdoing, but that they didn t have knowledge of things that had happened after 2009.
their read toers believe based on no evidence that the to be loid excesses of one publications tarnished thousands of news corp. journalists across the world, making the case immediately the isolated of the crime makes it key of the importance. free floating nation state that operates by its own rules that roams off corners wherever it can. it takes regulatory and tax average of whatever jurisdiction it operates in. for the most part, those of us who cover the story have admired their aggression and ability to win over and over. it was assumed that they colored on the line not just outside the line. the illusion that mr. murdoch will get whatever he wants, the times at london, whether it s the wall street journal has been blown away. there s a kind of at least in
they want they, you and i and the rest of the media they want us to believe based on no evidence that the publication somehow tarnished thousands of other news corp journalists across the world, making the case immediately that the isolatability of the crime is key to its importance. i think it s important that people think that it s a free floating nation state that operates by its own rules, that roams off corners wherever it can. it takes regulatory and tax advantage of whatever jurisdiction it operates in. for the most part, those of us who cover the story have admired their aggression and ability to win over and over. it was assumed that they colored just up to and on the line, not over the line. i think it s the illusion of the invincibility, that mr. murdoch will get whatever he wants, whether it s the times of london, the wall street journal, has been blown away. and there s a kind of at least in britain, a kind of