bill: u.s. supreme court apparently came up empty in their search for a leaker. more than eight months after somebody leaked a draft opinion that would overturn roe v. wade, the court says they still don t know who that person is. the mystery is left to david spunt live at d.o.j. what s up, david? i wish i had the mystery solved, but unfortunately i don t. this all comes because sunday is the 50th anniversary of the roe v. wade decision january 22, 1973. as you mentioned, the supreme court does not know who did this. now last may politico dropped a news bombshell leaking a draft opinion of the roe v. wade decision almost two months before the supreme court released it spawning intense protests across the country. the marshal of the court led the f.b.i.igation instead of the according to the rep and process some electronic data collected and a few other
well. now they lie to the world this is the same people that said there was no crisis of the border either. she went to a place where there were no problems democrats are ignoring this for your they dropped this nightly news bombshell that the head of the lab the virus. she has multiple connections with military officials. she and others collaborated wit military sponsors in december 2019. and fall of 2020 an article tha was offered up at a footnote that nbc has not been able to ascertain the circumstances.
committee. nobody has said that there is any sort of chink in the case laid out by the witnesses or even the case in the intel report last night. you were on air for hours like a news bombshell. is there any consternation that on the facts there is no defense for this president? reporter: well, look. republicans have continued to hit a couple of points on this. you heard it from some of their members here today that only gordon sondland of all the witnesses who were called during the fact-finding part of this had spoken directly with donald trump and sondland s point was that the president told him he didn t want anything from ukraine. republicans are going to go back to that again and again. one of the things that i d be interesting to see, turley in his opening statement said he didn t find that call by president trump to be perfect. he said far from it. republicans have been very united since the minute really before this but especially since their minority report on the intel com
does at&t know what it is? is it unusual to list negative 1 as a phone number and not a place? the report here, unidentified or anonymous number inside the white house makes it sound important. i don t read thus far, and i haven t fipished. we know it s inside the white house? i ve seen it referred to as negative 1 as a white house number! okay. of import. i have not seen, just looking. yeah, i have not seen it identified as who it belongs to. obviously in an investigation like this, people say oh, could that be the president. that is sometimes a potential inference. this report in the footnotes i ve read is not saying that to date. let s bring in jonathan allen. i know you ve been reporting on kamala harris up until just now, but you have more information on rudy giuliani. it s interesting, you go through this r report, his name is in here more than 500 times. this clearly shows and this is a news bombshell by the way, this