Given 7 minutes to present case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated must include their comments within the 7 or 3 minute period. They have up to 3 minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal if they are nonmembers. Our legal clerk will give you a verbal warning 30 seconds before the time is up. Four votes are required to grant your appeal or modify your determination. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, board rules or hearing schedules email board staff at board of appeals at sf gov. Org. Public participation is of paramount importance to the board and every effort has been made to replicate the in person hearing process. Sf gov tv is broadcasting and streaming this hearing live and well have the ability to receive Public Comments it for each item on todays agenda. To wave it on tv go to cable channel 38. It will be rebroadcast on fridays on channel 26. A link for the live stream is at sf gov. Org boa. Public comment can be provided in two ways one you c
Smallerriers Like Hawaiian Airlines at s. F. O. And has unsustainable increases for our carrier. In addition to that i want to point out some specific burdens that exist with respect to the h. W. O. Very rarely in any job marketplace can you find plans that are available to employees at no cost, let alone to entire families at no cost. The h. W. O. Mandate coverage is so far beyond what even the most generous employers offer their employees, including the city of San Francisco, with their own employees. Specifically Hawaiian Airlines and our workforce is highly unionized and we negotiate collective bargaining agreements which are voted upon and approved by employees that include generous wage and benefit packages. We do not believe that this legislation should supersede our collective bargaining agreements or interfere with our relationships with our labor partners. Thank you again for another opportunity to weigh in on such a monumental decision. I strongly urge you to oppose the ordi
So if we can go ahead to the next slide. This meeting will include a quick welcome by board of education president , mark sanchez, followed by a 20minute presentation on the proposed changes to Student Assignments. Well have 15 minutes for questions and answers about the proposed policy and 15 minutes to share your hopes, ideas, and concerns about these changes. Lastly well have five minutes to close this evenings meeting and share information about next steps. Ill going to play a video by mark san december. I wants to take a minute to explain why were making changes to the Student Assignment system and why this work is so important. As you likely already know, sfusd is in the process of changing our Student Assignment policy for our Elementary Schools. December 2018, we started this process by unanimously passing a board resolution and direct to develop a recommendation for a New Elementary School Student Assignment system. Now were nearing the end of a robust, multiyear process and t
Chancellor. I want to thank City Attorney clark and the department of children, youth and families. Last but not least my staff for all of their work on this. Before we go to Public Comment, do you have any questions or remarks, colleagues . Okay. Mr. Clerk. Any callers on the line . Thank you. Please let us know if there are callers ready for those who connected by phone press star 3 if you wish to speak for this item. Those already on hold in the queue please wait until you are prompted to begin and you will be informed your line is unmuted. On cable channel 26 or sfgovtv please call in now by following the instructions on the screen. Dial 4156550001. When prompted enter the i id1466994959. Press pound twice and star followed by 3 to enter cue to speak. Do we have callers for agenda 4 . There are no callers in the queue. Thank you, operations and mr. Public comment is closed. Colleagues. I would move we send this to the full board with positive recommendation. Mr. Clerk please call r
Groups that dont disclose their donors and take up to 250 million into the scheme, according to the washington post. Weird enough that people feel the need to run tv ads for judicial nominees, but when theyre taking a check for 17 million, two checks for 17 million if an anonymous donors or maybe two anonymous donors, yeah, if you think thats weird its because it is. That shoofnts happen that shouldnt happen anywhere around a court. And if theres one thing that we are entitled to there have been a lot of highminded speeches about the judiciary and its independence and all of that. The most important standard that a court must meet is that it is not a pantomime court. A pantomime court in which the rituals of adjudication get acted out. People come to the bench wearing their robes, hear the arguments, render decisions, read the briefs, buff at the end of the but at the end of the day, the decision is cooked by big special interest influence that insinuated its way into the court by cont