the right and they consider fox news to be right wing, covering these things, they begin to see their role as a corrective, as a counter weight to that information. so, one of the ways they handled that is just simply to ignore it and as a matter of fact in the van jones matter they didn t report the story until after jones had resigned. so i think there is a growing sense among people at the network newscasts, at the washington post, at the new york times, that they function as kind of a counter balance to what they sees a right wing misinformation out there. and that s why i think you see him behaving this way. bill: the network news has lost another million viewers. you know, they are going down the tubes. there is no doubt that they re. the new york times big, big trouble. the washington post, you know, newsweek is out. it s gone. so you are telling me that because of fox news success, they have to ignore stories that might attract viewers. this black panther story is
human rights commission. and this is stunning when you have the three network newscasts ignoring this story with all of the provocative sound, with all of the testimony by mr. christian in front of the committee, and you have couric and williams and diane sawyer basically saying, hey, we have got more important things to do than tell you about this unbelievable controversy. i don t get this at all. wife do you think they ignored it? well, let me tell you why i think this is happening. i think the continued success of fox, the continued success of conservative talk radio, and of conservative sites on the internet have actually pushed the so-called mainstream media a little farther to the left than they were before. and this is how it happens. in a story like van jones or like the new black panthers or about the nasa muslim outreach story, when you have outlets on
the right and they consider fox news to be right wing, covering these things, they begin to see their role as a corrective, as a counter weight to that information. so, one of the ways they handled that is just simply to ignore it and as a matter of fact in the van jones matter they didn t report the story until after jones had resigned. so i think there is a growing sense among people at the network newscasts, at the washington post, at the new york times, that they function as kind of a counter balance to what they sees a right wing misinformation out there. and that s why i think you see him behaving this way. bill: the network news has lost another million viewers. you know, they are going down the tubes. there is no doubt that they re. the new york times big, big trouble. the washington post, you know, newsweek is out. it s gone. so you are telling me that because of fox news success, they have to ignore stories that might attract viewers. this black panther story is
human rights commission. and this is stunning when you have the three network newscasts ignoring this story with all of the provocative sound, with all of the testimony by mr. christian in front of the committee, and you have couric and williams and diane sawyer basically saying, hey, we have got more important things to do than tell you about this unbelievable controversy. i don t get this at all. wife do you think they ignored it? well, let me tell you why i think this is happening. i think the continued success of fox, the continued success of conservative talk radio, and of conservative sites on the internet have actually pushed the so-called mainstream media a little farther to the left than they were before. and this is how it happens. in a story like van jones or like the new black panthers or about the nasa muslim outreach story, when you have outlets on
from the moment the new york times broke the news that hillary clinton did her state department business from private e-mail account media coverage has exploded, filled with questions and criticism including the network newscasts. tonight she is under fire for using only her private e-mail account in that very public role as secretary of state. the e-mails reveal the height of carelessness only the arrogant few can reach. a leader using private e-mail protects herself, but not her country. a few liberal pundits played defense noting the disclosure of the failure stems from requests from the house committee investigating the attack on the consulate in libya. how do we turn back a benghazi witch hunt part two? i mean this plays right into the clinton haters hands. house committee has now