Great before it was better for a certain class of people i. E. The bottom 99 percent it wasnt as great for the top one percent back then this is not some back of the napkin approximation according to a groundbreaking new working paper by carcassi price Catherine Edwards of the Rand Corporation have the more equitable income distributions of the 3 decades following world war 2945 through 1974 really held steady the aggregate annual income of americans earning below the 90th percentile would have been 2. 00 trillion dollars higher in the year 2018 alone this is an amount equal to nearly 12 percent of g. D. P. Enough to more than double Median Income enough to pay every single american in the bottom 9. 00 deciles an additional 1144. 00 a month every month every single year see the jamison of the scam perpetrated by wall street and the likes of Warren Buffett and the people over a black rock and all the private equity firms and j. P. Morgan and jamie diamond and all the global banks is tha
A look at back at the biggest stories in the last 7 days but 1st stay with us for the kaiser report. Oh hi im max foster this is the kaiser report you know there seems to be a bit of panic in the air. Play lets check in with Stacy Herbert i dont more max as you know weve had 4 years of a lot of political turmoil and starting to spill out into the streets everywhere you look not only in the United States but around the world and Rand Corporation might have an explanation for this now remember Rand Corporation if youre if you were around in the seventys they were part of the pentagon papers right it was identical ellsberg released the hundreds of pages of research they had done on the debacle that was the vietnam war and now they have basically done some research on the debacle that is fed policy of creating can tell you an heiress since 1971 so the top one percent of americans have taken 50 trillion dollars from the bottom 90 percent and thats made the us less secure this is according t
Sectors expanded use of technology, its just not ready primetime. During this hearing, well private sectors development, use and sale of technology as well as its partnerships with Government Entities, using this technology. We learned from our first may 22 of 2019 that he use of facial Recognition Technology can severely impact American Civil Rights and liberties, including the right to privacy. Protection and equal under the law. We learned during our second federal, n june 4 how state and local Government Entities use this technology on wide scale. Yet provide very little why itsncy on how and being used or on security measures to protect sensitive data. Despite these concerns, we see facial Recognition Technology and more in our everyday lives. Used in ology is being schools, grocery stores, irports, malls, theme parks, stadiums and on our phones, social media platforms, door and even in ootage hiring decisions and its used by Law Enforcement. This technology is completely unregula
F facial Recognition Technology. They testified before the House Oversight and reform committee. Working on e is legislation to address the emerging technology. Good morning, everyone, and is out objection the chair authorized to declare a recess of the committee at any time. Would now like to recognize myself to give an opening statement. Today the committee is holding on a critical ng issue. Facial recognition tech. Its clear that despite the sectors expanded use of technology, its just not ready primetime. During this hearing, well private sectors development, use and sale of technology as well as its partnerships with Government Entities, using this technology. We learned from our first may 22 of 2019 that he use of facial Recognition Technology can severely impact American Civil Rights and liberties, including the right to privacy. Protection and equal under the law. We learned during our second federal, n june 4 how state and local Government Entities use this technology on wide
The committee will come to order. Good morning, everyone. Without objection the chair is authorized to declare a recess of the committee at any time. With that i would like to recognize myself to give an Opening Statement. Today, the committee is holdingg our third hearing this congress on a critical issue, facial Recognition Technology. It is clear that, despite the private sectors expanded use of technology, its just not ready for prime time. During this hearing we will examine the private sectors development, use, and sale of technology as well as its partnerships with Government Entities, using this technology. We learn from our first hearing on may 22 of 2019 that the use of facial Recognition Technology can severely impact American Civil Rights and liberties, including the right to privacy, free speech, and equal protection under the law. We learned during our second hearing on june 4 how federal, state and local Government Entities use this technology on a wide scale, yet abide