You take the position that not moving them back before the president left was a violation of their First Amendment rights . We have not taken that position. We have not asserted that they had that there was an obligation to hold the president in position so that the demonstrators could be moved back to their former position. Our position is they shouldnt have been moved in the first place, because there wasnt a valid security reason and that the reason they were moved was solely because of the viewpoint they were expressing. And, the fact that thats not a separate claim that they werent moved back, but it is an indication that they were removed from where the president would be passing, in our view, that supports the inference of viewpoint discrimination. The question of mixed motive or improper motive, if we can get back to that for just a minute. Assume that the law and this is the wren case is as follows. If there is improper motive for an arrest, but that there was an objective bas
Giving you five minutes of discovery and then saying, hm. Or 10 minutes plus some judgment. Or they have five or six different weapons. That is what you are arguing, i think. It is a comes long way of focusing you on that question. Said to bert plausible it has to be something more than possible. But plausibility is not probability. The way we establish intent is rarely through the admission to local Law Enforcement or someone for anat the agent acted impermissible reason. What we do to establish intent is plead facts from which intent can be inferred. We believe we have pleaded facts both with respect to the treatment, with respect to the time that elapsed from the president s decision to dine, from the time he sat down and then 15 more minutes until the decision was made to remove the demonstrators. It is more than that, not just that you have to allege facts. Just quoting from page 681, the court goes on to consider the factual allegations to determine if they are plausible. Giveno
We want to hear from you on this topic. If you live in the east and central time zone and have an opinion on whether or not College Athletes should unionize. You can also contact us via social media. Should College Athletes be able to unionize . Joining us now on the phone is dave jamison of the huffington post. How did this issue get started . The way this got started was they said they wanted a Union Election. The National Labor relations oversees jobs in the private sector in the u. S. They had a hearing. It was to determine whether or not these players were actually employees and whether they would be eligible to have a union vote. This is basically standard procedure for any officer factor in the u. S. It is very unusual, because these are College Football players, but the regional director at the hearing and issued his determination. He believes that the layers are employees of the university. Host how is it that a regional director of the nlrb can make that decision . That is ho
Free of any fog this morning. Typically what brings us the fog is a cool onshore breeze that transports that ocean cool their direction this morning. Much the opposite. Weve got perfectly Crystal Clear. Visibility and winds pushing those dry, warm air masses from our inland valleys now towards the coastline. Thats whats going to keep us all free of the fog and then for quite a warm feeling day, unseasonably warm for this time of year. San mateo and hayward, youre at 58 degrees right now, oakland and concord at 57. Well, berkeley, San Francisco in the mid 60s, fairfax are only spot along with nap and fairfield dipping down into the upper 40s. Ill be talking about Everything Else you got to know for todays warm forecast center weekend cooldown. Still to come, john, thanks for that. Are lets get a look at your traffic this morning. A 7 minute ride headed into the city. Mays to that fremont street exit. Well, if youre hopping on the san mateo bridge, a 80 to 1, 1, a 12 minute ride for you.
Joining us today. I am joined by mr. King, mr. Borio, who is the head of the bank for international settlements. Larry summers, the former treasury secretary and professor at harvard university. And tyler goodspeed, who is a fellow at the hoover institution. And it served at the cea in the trump administration. Our panel today is on what have we learned and you can submit questions for the audience that we will get to later on on catos webpage. You can send those on facebook, you can submit them on twitter, using the cato and we will get to those questions after presentations from all of our panelists, which we will get to right now. And we will start with mervyn king, so lord king, over to you. Mr. King i am delighted to join you at the cato institutes 40th monetary conference. 40 years ago, we were coming out of the great inflation, when inflation reached double digits or higher. The Lessons Learned then would trigger macroeconomic policy issues, price stability and a sustainable fis