poor judgment but as far as their personal opinions are concerned, everybody has an opinion especially in this particular election. extremely provocative. we haven t had a provocative candidate like trump since georgia wallace. the things he said provoked reaction to people. they made a bet on the fact that hillary was going to be elected president and it was a poor bet, spent more time worrying about everybody thought hillary clinton and i m not saying she should or she shouldn t have, everybody thought she should have been president. it wasn t a poor decision, it was comey s action that changed the results. they were both poor candidates. neil: what i want to ask you, trying to get a sense, what was the context for some of the remarks about donald trump besides the fact that they might not have liked him, could give him the benefit of the doubt, could they have had information
lisa page left fbi. why is peter strzok still there in light of what we learned from the ig s report, that s an important question for mr. wray and rosenstein when they come in front of congress. neil: if you have peter strzok yourself, what would you want to hear of him, of course, he has very disparaging views of then candidate trump, he was providing a lot of research and early, you know, foot work for bob mueller since you re right. neil: what do you want to hear from him? he s the key player, essential figure throughout the entire narrative. ran the clinton investigation. was the lead investigator in russia investigation. he s the central character and i think those sequence of of text messages are important. remember, peter strzok opens the russian investigation on july 31st, 8 days later we have the text message that we saw on the report. we will stop trump from being president. one week after that, we had the text message, august 15th which says we need the insurance
tax cuts. neil: and hurts you to say the word new jersey? that s okay, my mom is from long island. neil: just over the hudson river. anyway. neil: those people, those people. jonas, what do you make of the pain that charles and i have to deal with. i don t understand why you guys haven t moved to connecticut yet, that s why it exists. slightly lower taxes than new jersey. neil: only slightly. well, the property tax is a lot less. as he said in the interview with you, the rich people are mobile, it s like corporations, if you tack too high in america they ll route everything through ireland. it s the middle class where they have to stay in new jersey and all of a sudden the tax base is shrinking, like detroit, everyone left and the place goes bank result. new jersey s reached their limit on essentially what they can tax without losing the tax revenue to flight. the other states there, it s not a country. america is not there yet. it s not that easy to leave the
occasionally gets too impressed with own success. ignore the real estate bubble and ignored tech boom in 2000. it could be those moments where it s all coming to a crash, i think at this point nothing really bad is going to happen to the economy or the tax cuts that are placed because of all this news. at least that s what investors are saying. neil: what do you think? i agree with jonas, health care is what holds best to democrs,hat they should be hammering over and over again. republicans are weak on the issue. neil: they are all over the map on the health care thing. obamacare is more popular, obama himself is. if you look at key races, new jersey, virginia, the health care issue was the bellwether there. when you look at the messaging out of democrats barring the crumbs and the thousand dollars,
took his passport and the witness thing. and they ransacked his offices and collins, ransacked his offices and the justification for the above and approval for the above has to be based on something substantial? how about is there a flight risk? evidence destroyed, witnesses, some criminality. and how are you going to stand before a judge, oh, we ransacked manafort s home. neil: as a lawyer when you hear about homes and offices ransacked and rifled through and storm in and get what they need. what do you think about that? i think it s extreme. i ve had clients in the throes of a criminal investigation. neil: it s approved for what reason? for those reasons. oh, there s some criminality that is going to take place or witnesses threatened or evidence destroyed. that s when you take the extreme