Confirm its appropriations limit under the gan provisions. In this calculation we have done, it reflects through calculations allowed by the state code that we have a 3. 77 local Income Growth and an 0. 4 0. 47 population growth and this allows for combined growth in the gam limit from the amount that you established last year of 2. 53 billion to a new level of 2. 63 billion for fiscal year 1213. Under the allowable calculations, we have shown that the budget for appropriations that are covered by this is at currently 2. 47 billion, so this reflects a level still 168 million below the gam limit. If the city were to collect so much revenue that it was above the gam limit, the law would require us to either change the rates to return or some other way return that excess revenue to tax payers or go to voters to ask voters to approve an increase in the limit, but we have not reached that point yet. A couple of other points you might be interested in, we did look back at fiscal year 1112 wi
Anderson, grant [speaker not understood] from the District Attorney and [speaker not understood] from our department. I just wanted to share with you the Commission Just finished three Community Meetings with our partners in the violence against women prevention and intervention grants program. These are direct Service Providers who work on a daily basis with the Domestic Violence victim. We held the Community Meeting at [speaker not understood]. We held some at the department for all of our agencies and at cameron house. And the themes that we heard over and over again were language barriers continue to persist when victim of Domestic Violence want to report a crime or followup on a crime, that cultural barriers exist, particularly among those immigrants where in their home countries Law Enforcement can be corrupt. So, they dont have the trust thats needed in order to report Domestic Violence and family violence. So, im very pleased today to report on a very strong and deep collaborat
Controllers office. Ill be very brief and happy to answer questions. This resolution before you is required by the california constitution and government code. Each year the city needs to confirm its appropriations limit under the gan provisions. In this calculation we have done, it reflects through calculations allowed by the state code that we have a 3. 77 local Income Growth and an 0. 4 0. 47 population growth and this allows for combined growth in the gam limit from the amount that you established last year of 2. 53 billion to a new level of 2. 63 billion for fiscal year 1213. Under the allowable calculations, we have shown that the budget for appropriations that are covered by this is at currently 2. 47 billion, so this reflects a level still 168 million below the gam limit. If the city were to collect so much revenue that it was above the gam limit, the law would require us to either change the rates to return or some other way return that excess revenue to tax payers or go to vo
Limit for fy 20122013 pursuant to california constitution article xiii b. Thank you very much for this item from the Controllers Office. We have [speaker not understood]. Thank you, members of the committee. Neil levinson, [speaker not understood] from the Controllers Office. Ill be very brief and happy to answer questions. This resolution before you is required by the california constitution and government code. Each year the city needs to confirm its appropriations limit under the gan provisions. In this calculation we have done, it reflects through calculations allowed by the state code that we have a 3. 77 local Income Growth and an 0. 4 0. 47 population growth and this allows for combined growth in the gam limit from the amount that you established last year of 2. 53 billion to a new level of 2. 63 billion for fiscal year 1213. Under the allowable calculations, we have shown that the budget for appropriations that are covered by this is at currently 2. 47 billion, so this reflects
Item from the Controllers Office. We have [speaker not understood]. Thank you, members of the committee. Neil levinson, [speaker not understood] from the Controllers Office. Ill be very brief and happy to answer questions. This resolution before you is required by the california constitution and government code. Each year the city needs to confirm its appropriations limit under the gan provisions. In this calculation we have done, it reflects through calculations allowed by the state code that we have a 3. 77 local Income Growth and an 0. 4 0. 47 population growth and this allows for combined growth in the gam limit from the amount that you established last year of 2. 53 billion to a new level of 2. 63 billion for fiscal year 1213. Under the allowable calculations, we have shown that the budget for appropriations that are covered by this is at currently 2. 47 billion, so this reflects a level still 168 million below the gam limit. If the city were to collect so much revenue that it was