putin-like scale. what you talked about the constitutional implications. when the founding fathers talked about impeachment at the constitutional convention, the example of the impeachable offense, the thing they had most in mind is that the president would receive payments from foreign powers. and the reason they were so concurrent is in the time of the writing of these documents, the 1780s, 1790s, the last republics they knew of on earth were being snuffed out one by one by one in every case because powerful, wealthy neighbors were intervening in those republics and purchasing power within the republic with foreign presidents. that s exactly the core evil that the impeachment clause was designed to prevent. so you look at the most recent reporting on neil farage. when he met with nigel
world, and i am going to deploy the assets of the united states to incentivize or intimidate people into paying me. if the story from argentina is true, he is pressuring the argentina evens to help him. if the report on nigel farage is correct, in every case he is taking something that belongs to the american people, the strength of the american state and use it for his purposes. let me go to former prosecutor butler. it s not always a bag of cash. stevens has the result of a house he built. how would you enforce this against a president who would do the investigating? it s completely unchartered territory. it would be a conflict of interest, again, for the attorney general who appointed by the president. so an independent prosecutor would have to be appointed. this is so easy to avoid. all he has to do is liquidate