between the union and rail employers as a red herring and a stunt . speaking to our transport correspondent katy austin, shapps said outdated practices had to end for a resolution to be possible. it isa it is a red herring and one put up it is a red herring and one put up by the unions and backed up by labour even though the labour mayor in london isn t doing exactly what they are saying. the point of this is that employers are the only people who can settle this strike. myjob is to set an overall mandate, which is what i have done, and then as for the employers in the unions to discuss the very detailed implementation of that. i am afraid it is a stunt by the unions and one thing they can do with get out of the tv studios and get back into the negotiating rooms and settle this dispute, which can easily be settled because there were so many modernisations from antiquated work practices, for example, two vans have to be sent to a maintenance job when
today the russian deputy foreign minister was saying the concern they have is that every year, even though it s not formally part of nato or part of the nato structure, ukraine gets more and more into the nato fold with more and more military exercises, with the united states and other countries supplying troops, supplying advisers, that it is becoming a de facto nato partner. so we re hearing a somewhat more subtle argument from the russians than we had in the past, but as far as we can tell, and we re not in the room because there are many different negotiating rooms right now, they re happening here in kiev. then in germany. they re happening in geneva. they ve been happening in moscow. the german foreign minister was in moscow yesterday. this is true international diplomacy. but as far as the public positioning, the two sides seem far off, but we re hearing today a little bit more of an explanation from russia about what exactly its objections are.
change your car. this people get rid of your gas boiler, change your car- people get rid of your gas boiler, change your car. this is the tricky stuff, change your car. this is the tricky stuff. isn t change your car. this is the tricky stuff, isn t it? change your car. this is the tricky stuff, isn t it? it change your car. this is the tricky stuff, isn t it? it will change your car. this is the tricky stuff, isn t it? it will be stuff, isn t it? it will be extremely tricky. it can be done. and if you look at electric vehicles, for example, and you go back even five years, i think most people were thinking well, it is really going to happen? maid? people were thinking well, it is really going to happen? now they know it is going really going to happen? now they know it is going to really going to happen? now they know it is going to happen. - really going to happen? now they know it is going to happen. two l know it is going to happen. two final questions, first, what wou
the other examples and go back even five years, i think those people were thinking, is this really going to happen. were thinking, is this really going to ha en. ., ., were thinking, is this really going to hauen. ., . , ., , to happen. two final questions. first, to happen. two final questions. first. would to happen. two final questions. first, would you to happen. two final questions. first, would you be to happen. two final questions. first, would you be saying - to happen. two final questions. first, would you be saying to i to happen. two final questions. . first, would you be saying to world leaders for going into this conference in glasgow, sitting in those negotiating rooms, won t you be saying about how history will regard the decisions they make? the truth is, regard the decisions they make? the: truth is, you cannot regard the decisions they make? ti9 truth is, you cannot put off these decisions. for now, because it is next decade that is going to be dramatically impo
moving forward. this is the very same agreement the u.s. president promised to pull out of, that can t happen until 2020. given the fact there were u.s. representatives who signed on to these rules, are some seeing this as an opening that attitudes are shifting about this agreement? reporter: in the long term, yes, they ve given their lives to the science of climate change. it s a fact it s happening. i think many say their presence here or inside those negotiating rooms was not acting as a spoiler. they were trying to throw a wrench in the works, so to speak, and i think that may be because they would have said, listen, we re leaving at the end of 2020. donald trump gets his way so the rules don t really affect us but that would have been difficult for them to get that done on a higher level the u.s. has been a