these are my own and not views of the army. i think the real story is is that the pragmatic considerations have won out in this instance, with 99 of the charges they ve gone away, they ve been dropped, but with the two serious charges where we ve had a detainee death, one in afghanistan and one in iraq, then there will be, moving forward there will be some form of prosecution. i think that the pragmatic reasons for this are pretty clear. number one, you re going to find in any jury in america it s going to be tough to convict on these instances where there wasn t a detainee death. and secondly the interrogators in those cases are going to have a pretty good faith reliance on the legal advice that they received at the time from the white house office of legal con counsel. that would be a pretty good defense for them and a necessity defense that the circumstances warranted it. but we don t have any indication that that was the case. but the pragmatic gretchen: you re saying it was good