is left up to potential hosts and refugees to find each other. so huge numbers of people have resorted to going to unregulated facebook groups, set up with the best possible motivations. we found some men clearly unacceptable. they certainly, one case we found with a criminal record, serious convictions. we found another man with a history of domestic abuse trying to contact young women. we were also told in some areas of the country, up to 30% of those wanting to be hosts where men over 40, expressing an interest in hosting women in their 20s and 30s and an obvious red flag. i reported substandard housing, one house that a volunteer described as not fit for rehoming a dog. another, bizarrely enough full of nazi memorabilia. and another one where the refugee family were offered simply a mattress on the floor. ,., were offered simply a mattress on the floor. , , were offered simply a mattress on thefloor. , , the floor. and so i suppose this s stem the floor. and so i suppose this
unsuitable. we had one we find who had criminal convictions, another had criminal convictions, another had a history of domestic abuse. we are also told that in some areas of the country up to 30% of people registering our men in their 40s or 50s who are looking to host women, single women, in their 20s or 30s. we also have reports of deeply unsuitable accommodation, one which was described as a volunteer is so filthy it would not be right to home a dog there. another one was full of nazi memorabilia and a final one we discovered where there were just a mattress on the floor for the entire family. what has the government said? first of all, thousands of people have met their hosts in the refugees and have had a good experience and match. the government rejects these criticisms and says in a statement the homes for ukraine scheme has safeguards in place, including home for security and background checks. including home for security and background checks. angus crawford, thank ou. angus
. but the horror wasn t over. they discovered another shallow greater bay and there buried beneat more rubble, the body of bo icelar, the other american. when they found the bodies, they realized, it s not people with suspicions and accusations, it s all really happening. reporter: keith watched. he says they found evidence of the ghastly crime, bo s i.d. cher s passport, purse and cell phone used to send those text messages saying cher had simply gone for a sail. there was more, nazi memorabilia, strange say thanic signs, jewelry that may have belonged to the crimes. and a dozen gold teeth. he lived with these things, corpses and people s personnel effects around them. two of their friends were
programme is controversial because there are plenty of people who considered it to unfairly concentrate on muslims in the past and demonises certain communities. it has not always work. some people have gone on it. it is voluntary and is not kind any carry any kind of criminal record. they can move referred to by nhs workers, police, any member of the public. if they say i am concerned about someone wearing nazi memorabilia, joining a weird cult, getting extreme, that would. he would then get a visit from social workers, he or she would get a visit and be encouraged to join the programme. but they do not have to. it carries no criminal record. one of the things people will look into after this probably is where any signs missed, any clues missed? there will be i think an