comparemela.com

Page 21 - Nayyera Haq News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170527:22:21:00

done since nato s inception, give a full public, full throated and unequivocal endorsement of that mutual defense agreement and that is a problem. bigly. back with me now nayyera haq, jack rice. how big a deal is it that he failed to make that point from a diplomatic point of view. huge. here is why. united states has relied on several members of nato to support our objectives including iraq, 9/11, afghanistan. people have bled to defend u.s. national interest. on top of that migration challenges, terrorism. these are intel compacts we have with nato members united states relies on for information. we use nato far more than people think. we are relying on them to step up when the united states has a challenge. cory lewandowski who used to be campaign manager on what executive producers calls the kids on the curvy couch show, fox & friends.

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170527:14:20:00

headquarters in brussels while standing by new 9/11 and article 5 memorial, a tribute to both the lives lost in the terror attack and nato invoking article 5 for the first and only time ever in its history in support of us. despite that not so subtle reminder of how vital nato s defense pledge is, trump did not do what every other american has done since nato s inception, give a full public, full throated and unequivocal endorsement of that mutual defense agreement and that is a problem. bigly. back with me now nayyera haq, jack rice. how big a deal is it that he failed to make that point from a diplomatic point of view. huge. here is why. united states has relied on several members of nato to support our objectives including iraq, 9/11, afghanistan.

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170527:14:09:00

we get right back to the things we ve talked about a lot that make people vulnerable to be recruited. need and greed. have you somebody in jared kushner who needs money. he needs money to finance his buildings. you start to see you were always asking the question of the why. are you starting to feel like the why might be the need for financing. when there is doubt, there is no doubt. we are dancing around this. absolutely, joy, you re right. what this is is a pattern is emerging here. when you have people omitting things sf 86, forget about criminality. more the pattern, pattern of deception. why are you trying to deceive investigators, trying to hide this. when you have flynn and kushner sitting down and having a discussion about this, no longer one person doing it. now you have 2014 if you have two spies, not just one but a spy ring. if you have two, it s much more likely there are three. to go back to jack and nayyera and malcolm has said, this warrants a much, much wider

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170331:05:15:00

i mean, this is somebody who the home agency is supposed to be representing them. he is they re trying to paul him back. they weren t happy with his work and what he was doing. but you have the senior advisers and the political appointees no, we like this guy. he is doing our bidding. right. so there is already a politicization of this role that is supposed to be strictly nonpartisan. let s not forget that steve bannon is also sitting on the national security council where he shouldn t be. very quick to you, kathleen, is there any circumstance under which paul ryan could be right in calling these people who went in and got the information and gave to it the white house whistle-blowers? if they were disclosing some kind of wrongdoing, you could characterize them that way. but that would not justify them going to the person who is being investigated and disclosing it. absolutely. i think that is pretty clear to everybody, except maybe devin nunes. malcolm nance, kathleen clar

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170331:02:16:00

he shouldn t be. very quick to you, kathleen, is there any circumstance under which paul ryan could be right in calling these people who went in and got the information and gave to it the white house whistle-blowers? if they were disclosing some kind of wrongdoing, you could characterize them that way. but that would not justify them going to the person who is being investigated and disclosing it. absolutely. i think that is pretty clear to everybody, except maybe devin nunes. malcolm nance, kathleen clark and nayyera haq, thank you for joining us tonight. whether you re after supreme performance. .advanced intelligence. .or breathtaking style. .there s a c-class just for you. decisions, decisions, decisions. lease the c300 sedan for $389 a month

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.