Kicked her over to the state could the state said she made too much money. Obamacare sent her back up with some Insurance Company, and she got something in the mail a card with a doctors name on it that is not from our area i cannot find it in the phone book. There was a deductible for an office visit on the card. And so they sent her the bill. Well, she makes 6,000 and they sent her a bill for 439 a month. She got back and told him that she couldnt afford this. It would come out to 5,300 a year paying for the obamacare that they set her up with. They gave her something at the end of the year for the taxes and exemption. She went through this this year again, and obamacare sent her back to the state, she told him that the state said she made the same much money as she did the year before. They sent her back to the obamacare, and obamacare supposed to be sending her some kind of exemption. Now, what is this exemption for . They told her that if she would have made more money she would h
Legislative power that is addressed in article section 1 from the election of senators in article 1 section 3. And again in smiley that made clear that the meaning, as this court reiterated just last week in yates, that the meaning of a term in an enactment may differ depending on the function that the term is serving. Now youre going to the statute. But just under the constitution youre saying the legislature in the first article of section 3, the now repealed section that talks about choosing senators means Something Different than it means in the following section. As this court explained in smith versus hawk, which was an article 5 question of the meaning of the word legislature for purposes of ratification. In smith versus hawk, this court said that in the article 1 section 3 election of senators by the legislature and in article 5 the ratification power, what was at issue was a power that is the power to elect and the power to ratify that specifically comported with the elected r
From the issues of the postcivil war decades that we dealt with before. The first proposition that has been with us in this course that is central to the way that we think about American History is that the United States has always been an international society. International and obvious ways, people see the classroom with having people of different backgrounds and areas of the world, but also international in the sense that the United States has always depended upon the movement of people, the movement of goods, and the movement of finances from far away. There was never, never a time when the United States or americans living and what would become the United States for nonamericans living and what would become United States never a time when they were isolated from the rest of the world. Never a time when they were an island without deep connections elsewhere. Our ideas of governments, people have populated our society, our trade, our economy have all been deeply dependent upon inter
Next, university of texas at austin professor jeremy surry talks about the world fair in chicago and the for policy. He describes the 1893 worlds fair in chicago and the expansion of the u. S. Navy as ways that america began to build an international presence. This class is about an hour and 10 minutes. Prof. Suri we are going to talk about americas emergence as a global power. The transformations that occurred in the United States in the late 19th century transformations that change the United States from being one country distant from the center of International Conflicts and activities into becoming a central actor, not the most dominant actor, not the most powerful, but now an essential actor by the late 19th century and the ways in which International Affairs were conducted in a country to be reckoned with in international space. One way to think about this is that the United States goes from being a continental power after the civil war where we started this course to the a power
About americas emergence as a global power. The transformations that occurred in the United States in the late 19th century, transformations that change the United States from being one country distant from the center of International Conflicts and activities into becoming a central actor, not the most dominant actor, not the most powerful, but now an essential actor by the late 19th century and the ways in which International Affairs were conducted in a country to be reckoned with in international space. One way to think about this is that the United States goes from being a continental power after the civil war where we started this course to the a power now being a power now with International Range that it did not have before with a whole new set of problems that were related, but also different to from the issues of the postcivil war decades that we dealt with before. The first proposition that has been with us in this course that is central to the way that we think about American