Nominal Index [Citation 607 - 619]Gemini Developers v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 607Arti Rajesh Karangutkar v. Anna Rocky Fernandes and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 608Chintan.
Nominal Index [Citation 553 - 619]The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation v. UoI 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 553Shonali Kedar Dighe v. Ashita Tham and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 554Anuradha Kapoor and Ors..
Nominal Index [Citation 301 – 619]Bina Saxena w/o Late Ravendra Kumar Saxena v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 301Hemant Dhirajlal Banker v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 302CIT v. M/s.
The High Court of Bombay has held that the remedy under the SARFAESI Act is not a bar to the arbitration proceedings. It held that both the remedies are for different stages of debt recovery and.
The High Court of Bombay has held that a debt owed to a financial institution covered only under the SARFAESI Act is arbitrable, however, a debt owed to a financial institution to which the.