after using russian disinformation to smear federal agents on behalf of the clinton campaign. in breaking today, he testified that hillary clinton herself improve the smear campaign. but denied any involvement in the efforts to involve the fbi. now even the world s richest ma and his tweeting about the case elon missed tweeted i bet peopl don t know that clinton campaig lawyer using campaign funds created an elaborate hoax about trump and russia. it makes you wonder what else i fake. here now with reaction is fox news legal analyst greg jarrett and someone who was in the courtroom today, thank you so much for being here with us, greg, i want to start with you because oh my goodness, hillary clinton personally signed off o this, personally. hillary clinton herself? she personally approved the scheme to peddle phony collusio information to that media. it dropped like a bombshell by her own campaign manager. it seems so incredibly foolish for the defense of all people t have c
military attack and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign track and says the unauthorized disclosure of this information could put at risk the national security of the united states. that is so incredibly significant because actually just last night here on cnn, tim parlatory, until recently part of the trump legal team, started to form ulate that the nature o the documents matter, and he was right, but suggested that perhaps old schedules that would have been top secret, classified at a certain point, would not rise to the occasion. this indictment seems to lay out some very clear instances of real information that was related to national security, that was not only in large quantities stored in the former president s actively used social club, but stored in public,
that communication and you have people in business they can hav its, but you have it when you believe in what you are saying. when you own the nature of what it is you are proposing. you don t need the cards, you don t need the script, you don fumble over what you really meant, if you are trying to obscure, if you re trying to gaslight, then you use techniques like gas lighting, which is effectively trying to fool people into believing something is true that isn t. and that takes a different kind of communication. when we talk about the nature o what the american people are used to, and we talk a lot abou donald trump and so do the democrats, what he showed us is what real commitment what it
republican caucus? i think the house republican caucus, you can have a strategy in the house republican caucus. the chance of that has seen the light of day as a successful executed plan are very, very small and i think another problem with eric cantor for his constituents and really his own members, it s so hard to know where he stood on these issues. he was so about inside baseball and process. as a reporter covering him, you almost never knew exactly where he was on this and why and he always seemed to be more interested in being house speaker than really almost anything else. it was so hard to know where he stood. i don t blame the house leadership for not expecting this. nobody expected this. but they should all of them should be thinking a few steps down the line about what happens with their own jobs given the nature o this house republican caucus right now. if you go to sleep at night, you re probably not paying attention. but, josh, you know, a lot of this is going to be