these allegations were nonetheless referred to proip offici appropriate officials for review. starting with the speaker of the house saying the situation demonstrates hillary clinton had a complete disregard for properly handling classified information and that the state department official in the middle of this was just trying to hidemishandling of information. state department said the allegation of a prid pro quo is inaccurate and doesn t align with the facts. see how this carries over to the debate. back to the group. can donald trump distill this stuff, this from the fbi, other stuff in the hacked john podesta e-mails, the campaign chairman john podesta released by wikileaks, take that and say, here s the problem. why she houn be president and i asam the argument part of this system, collusion, insider training and all the like. can he do it? i don t know if he can do it but should do it if he hopes to
second wind to sort of trumpian politics. and, remember, he spent years trying to delegitimize the current president being a cheerleader for thebirther movement. plans if he loses, set up shop after the election saying she s not real, not legitimate. don t support anything. don t support compromise. see how it goes. on this point, bring in tim kaine, talking about this, asked about it does he think donald trump is up to something? he s blaming the media. he s blaming the gop. he s saying that america can t run a fair election. he is swinging at every fan pha of his own imagination, because he knows he s losing. and ah, that s the argument they re make, in the closing days here, and, you know, the democrats will once again have to push back against another series of unsubstantiated claims he s making.
heads um about this thing coming out. there is some sucking up, a little coordination. feeds into the argument he s making. republican voters will be more than happy to hear a few jabs at that. and the question is, does it, is it just fun? is it it can be both. wecan it grow. the most effective minutes in the first debate shts she s a creature of washington, been in the city 30 years part of the problem, this inbox proves it. the argument to make consistently across the course of the debate. and waiting to see trump populist and runs that way, democrats roll their eyes at that, but part of his appeal. how does he take advantage of an e-mail bernie sanders would have loved to have in the democratic pr primaries. podesta saying what if the speeches ever leaked out what s in them? in one is hillary clinton talking to goldman sachs saying, with political people again i would say the same thing. you know, there was a lot of
in the second debate, trump did seem to have studied up a little more on the e-mail stuff, on the classified markings and all that but short-handing it saying with the c on it, wasn t explaining it to the people who aren t following all the time. if he can make that step it could be go for him. he needs to make the argument over and over these e-mails, i think they do, show she is business as usual in washington and business is bad. an effective argument but needs to dress it up with the facts. most effective. my read of the e-mails as well is that the sort of worst part of them watching a campaign struggle to sell what they view, acknowledge, as sort of in the e-mails a flawed product here. i think what it does is basically in the e-mails you see the campaign struggling with a lot of the very same issues that bother the american people about hillary clinton. smoking gun, new information? not necessarily, but it is kind of a reminder of what it is that, has made a large section of
actively to change impressions and a slow, slow drip from wi wikileaks. and this last big debate, 60, 70, 80 million people watches, who knows. ratings will be, first one got 80-something. is this the right argument for donald trump saying this is a rigged system? right now before the vote? remember, we didn t hear this when winning republican primaries. did hear in a bad stretch in the republican primes. donald trump tweeting a time the campaign means the media, you in the media are trying to rig the system. that s not what donald trump says. of course, large-scale voter fraud happening on and before election day. what do rubben leaders deny what is going on? so naive. he doesn t seem to have evidence of that, and secretary of states of state across the country, a number of them republicans including in ohio are saying, no. there is no evidence of large-scale voter fraud, but