Bodies like this, there are lowerlevel working groups that will feed into this on a regular basis, is that correct . Why dont i asked richard and brandy to talk to that . As somebody who also cochairs the Nuclear Posturing view, i think my colleagues and i serve as the daytoday coaches for the bpr and i think she probably got sick and tired of the end of it when i kept making comparisons to the Nuclear Posture review. I think there was some value there in one of the outcomes in the npr, we do implementation, a lot of those issues that were identified had a body to go back to to be the lead for implementation. In other cases, it was policy or somewhere else. As we were going through the process, we realized, number one, just the value of getting this collective group of people and officials into the same room on really a weekly basis, to have these discussions and dialogue and identify gaps and scenes, wherever they may be. And we kind of recognized, we probably should sustain us in som
Representatives, as well as representatives from northern command, because of their singular responsibility for pandemic preparedness and department of defense support to civil authorities. As well as a special operations command. They have responsibility as the coordinating authority for wmd related activities. It is not just an osd body. It is very much one that will , we hope, weve not met yet, but will have active participation from the services, from the combatant commands, so that it has that element of hearing from all parts of department, where are the challenges and what is needed to get after them. Im assuming, like most bodies like this, there is lowerlevel working groups that will feed into this on a regular basis and meet more often. Is e that correct . Yeah, why dont i ask richard and brandi to talk to that. Sure. Just briefly say is somebody who also cochaired the Nuclear Posture review, i think my colleagues, and dr. Vann and i served as the daytoday cochairs working gr