As part of Manatt’s continuing monthly coverage of the aftermath of Facebook v. Duguid and how district courts are applying it to determine whether a calling system meets the Supreme.
Rotstain v. Trustmark Nat’l Bank,Fifth Circuit Stanford Ponzi Scheme case, did defendant financial institutions provided banking services that supported furthered Stanford’s scheme and did the Defendants participated breaches of fiduciary duty that harmed Stanford investors
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) claimed they were entitled to funds from construction contracts between Cosmos Industrial Services, Inc..
In Barnett v. First Nat’l Bank of Omaha, Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-337-CHB, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37563 the court granted a Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In assessing the case the Court relief HEAVILY on Barry in determining that a LiveVox dialer was not an ATDS.