Of good afternoon. Good afternoon, i am to theed to welcome you National Security of implications of Climate Change. Were honored for this briefing to happen and this very timely point in time as well as abilities important issues and i want to express my gratitude and enthusiasm for the partnership that we have in terms of bringing you this briefing with the partnership of the Jackson Foundation and i wanted to be sure to mention we are joined by the foundation today including the president on the other board as well as the foundations executive director so oh thank you very much for your support for your long understanding and visionary approach to carry out that legacy for whom the foundation was set up in the areas which he for so long that he was your in the congress or in the senate where he chaired that Energy Committee but took an important leadership role with International Affairs and education environment and Natural Resources and bill whole role of public service. Also thin
Enslaved or even exterminated. Weve seen that and its what weve been thinking of and its what we dread. So lets be triumphant about either religion or secularism. Were meeting seeking creatures. We try and discover meaning and we also miniaturize, especially, as the world gets more complex, perhaps, the moment we need to miniaturize psychologically. Lets be aware of that. Briefly, please. If we are going to determine another meeting and other so i think we have to talk about centralization of islam, as well. Because we complain about polarization of islam. We have been discussing this issue of almost one century. But now, unfortunately, its it has become a topic of an issue of second laization. So what are we going to do with religion. What are we going to do with islam. What are we going to do with islam in european countries. As you said, i was. Its very extremely important, we have to deal with it. Three points, one is muslim world, does not see itself necessarily as the muslim worl
Enslaved or even exterminated. Weve seen that and its what weve been thinking of and its what we dread. So lets be triumphant about either religion or secularism. Were meeting seeking creatures. We try and discover meaning and we also miniaturize, especially, as the world gets more complex, perhaps, the moment we need to miniaturize psychologically. Lets be aware of that. Briefly, please. If we are going to determine another meeting and other so i think we have to talk about centralization of islam, as well. Because we complain about polarization of islam. We have been discussing this issue of almost one century. But now, unfortunately, its it has become a topic of an issue of second laization. So what are we going to do with religion. What are we going to do with islam. What are we going to do with islam in european countries. As you said, i was. Its very extremely important, we have to deal with it. Three points, one is muslim world, does not see itself necessarily as the muslim worl
Enslaved or even exterminated. Weve seen that and its what weve been thinking of and its what we dread. So lets be triumphant about either religion or secularism. Were meeting seeking creatures. We try and discover meaning and we also miniaturize, especially, as the world gets more complex, perhaps, the moment we need to miniaturize psychologically. Lets be aware of that. Briefly, please. If we are going to determine another meeting and other so i think we have to talk about centralization of islam, as well. Because we complain about polarization of islam. We have been discussing this issue of almost one century. But now, unfortunately, its it has become a topic of an issue of second laization. So what are we going to do with religion. What are we going to do with islam. What are we going to do with islam in european countries. As you said, i was. Its very extremely important, we have to deal with it. Three points, one is muslim world, does not see itself necessarily as the muslim worl
Law professor had an off in the New York Times, she writes the Supreme Court has become an agent of partisan warfare to the extent it could do real damage to the institution. Is the Supreme Court to political . Republicans, 202 7488001. Democrats, 202 7488000. Independents, 202 7488002. You can make a comment on social. Edia, cspanwj here is the oped from yesterdays New York Times, resetting the post scalia Supreme Court. Been his death, there has plenty of talk about the substantial impact his absence will have on the Supreme Court stockett. Fate has handed the justices a chance to hit reset. Uncharitable and tasteless, so be it. I have become conserved the majority is permitting the court become an agent of partisan warfare to an extent that threatens real warfare to the institution. His role on and off the bench contributed to that development. I am not claiming he was completely responsible, given the polarizing politics of the day. More people disapprove of the court, 50 approve o