A public service. My name is Kathleen Johnson and today i am with the healths historian matt when you ski. The date is 2016. We are in the house are turning studio and we are pleased we spoke speaking with for a presented from new york. Thank you very much for coming today. Very excited to be a part of this project. So this project that we are working on is to recognize and to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the election of Jeannette Rankin to congress. The first woman. So we have a bunch of questions that we wanted to ask you today. First, of when you are young did you have any role models . No. I had never thought about that question but i dont think so. I mean, you ask her grandmother mother and father to sign it my notion of what women could be. And so it never occurred to me, certainly never to enter into politics to be front and center. I cannot think of too many role models when i was really young that were female that change along the way it gratefully. How did you first bec
Hope we can all do. Not only improving that helped but also educating the country to know that there is treatment for that and they can be great contributors to society and the workplace. We thank you very much for those thoughts. We leave it up to you to connect those dots and help others as well. [applause] friday he attends ceremonies in normandy, marking the 70th anniversary of the dday invasion of world war ii. Russian president Vladimir Putin is also scheduled to be at the ceremonies. House hearing on programs to help veterans returned to civilian life. Then, former president george h. W. Bush is honored. After that, q and a with author brett the behr. The soviet system in Eastern Europe contained the seeds of its own destruction. Many of the problems that we saw at the end again at the very beginning. I spoke about the attempt to control all institutions and control all parts of the economy and political and social life. One of the problems when you do that, when you try to cont
And consequently, the contributions that employers make to the city option will be routed to medical reimbursement accounts that are administered by the city for individual employees, these are similar to frankly the Health Reimbursement accounts that are used widely today and administered privately, there are some difference, one of those which i think youre getting to is that the medical reimbursement accounts administered by the city have no prescribers other than them being available broadly for medical services. You said earlier, i want to get the number right, that about 35 of employers that use these hras have not allowed in this past year that the money be used for Health Insurance . That is correct. If that money is now going to be used in healthy San Francisco lets say, will healthy San Francisco place restrictions on the use of that money . I would imagine that we are not going to prohibit people from using that to buy Health Insurance . That sounds unlikely. I would be relu
Folks now going the route of insurance or healthy San Francisco . Yes, going the Health Insurance or contributing to the city option, the contribution tos the city option as has been indicated previously, the pool and the size of the healthy San Francisco problem, excuse me, the healthy San Francisco program is likely to be reduced and consequently, the contributions that employers make to the city option will be routed to medical reimbursement accounts that are administered by the city for individual employees, these are similar to frankly the Health Reimbursement accounts that are used widely today and administered privately, there are some difference, one of those which i think youre getting to is that the medical reimbursement accounts administered by the city have no prescribers other than them being available broadly for medical services. You said earlier, i want to get the number right, that about 35 of employers that use these hras have not allowed in this past year that the mo
2014, again, no with standing the possibility of changes at the federal or local level, employers would simply provide Health Insurance or contribute to the city option, those would be the two principle methods of complying with our local spending requirement. I see. So, talking about the 53 of employers who place restrictions on these accounts, then were talking abthese folks now going the route of insurance or healthy San Francisco . Yes, going the Health Insurance or contributing to the city option, the contribution tos the city option as has been indicated previously, the pool and the size of the healthy San Francisco problem, excuse me, the healthy San Francisco program is likely to be reduced and consequently, the contributions that employers make to the city option will be routed to medical reimbursement accounts that are administered by the city for individual employees, these are similar to frankly the Health Reimbursement accounts that are used widely today and administered p