Journal articles to providers out there and whether or not that should be reported. Its one that you and i spent time on and thats a challenging one absolutely but ultimately i am comfortable with sitting down with my provider and asking about a payment showing up in the database and having her tell me that this is related to learning more about this condition, which you dont have but another patient may have and that is why that was there. There are choices. Its to not take it, to take it and report it, or to purchase it on your own. Those are legitimate choices and providers have the opportunity to make those and then the reports go to the database and the patients can ask. We continue to believe thats totally legitimate and legal and attaching we are not rushing to attach judgment here and i hope i can continue to make that case successfully here. Can you wait for the mic please . The idea that a physician should never talk to a pharmaceutical rep or a device rep is like saying plea
Salmonthompson amendment. Daca protects a large number of unlawfully resident aliens from deportation. In addition to constitutional concerns and National Security implications madam chair, the action poses a range of unintended consequences. Case in point the president s policy creates a incentive to hire Illegal Immigrants over lawfully present workers. Illegal aliens who are granted deferred action are exempt from being counted under the 2010 Health Care Laws employer mandate. Which requires employers with 50 or more employees to offer Health Insurance or pay a penalty. Essentially the president s create add situation where employers face a penalty for hiring americans over illegal aliens. Madam chairman, the president s current deferred action expansion promotes the hiring of individuals who have broken the law. Over the men and women who have come through legal channels worked hard, and played by the rules. Congressman salmon and i are proud to offer this commonsense amendment. Th
What about 2 of the genes can do. About 20 of the genes can do. It is like trying to design when you dont know what 20 of the parts do, just that they are necessary. My late uncle, who was part of the boeing design team on the 757 said, imagine if boeing did not know what 27 of the parts did. He said, what makes you think we did . [laughter] this is an interesting idea. You take the genes that you think are necessary for life. You shoot one of them and see if it is to live 00 if it is still alive. Where are you now in the shooting gallery . The problem with that method, and it is a good description of what weve done. It turns out it is important for like. There are dual pathways and dual systems that have not been totally recognized by modern science. It is hard to get funding to study these things. When you knock a gene out on its own, it does not kill the cell. But if you knock out an unknown counterpart, you can do that. If we use the airplane analogy and your triple seven aircraft
Or how anxious for fresh water that this would be something that politicians would bless . Do we need this . Our plan is not to add them back to the environment. I think that would be a mistake to do. As you know, we sailed around the globe picking samples in the ocean and the and sequencing the organisms there. Over 40 of our oxygen comes from those algae. We wouldnt want those replaced by algae that produce a whole lot of oil instead of oxygen to say give us an oily goo in the oceans. These would be organisms that in fact within that lives outside of the laboratory or outside a production environment and that is an important part of our design is building these so they cant survive on their own. But we are thinking of industrial manufacturing and applications. So, for example, you can convert sugar into almost anything. We are working on designing new pathways that dont exist in nature for making the chemicals that go into plastic bottles. Right now that comes from oil, a byproduct o