Loftus im not thank you, sergeant commissioner president loftus commissioner turman commissioner marshall commissioner dejesus commissioner mazzuco commissioner wong commissioner wong is in route and commissioner serlina have you a quorum and greg suhr the police chief and director the occ joyce hicks. Thank you sergeant id like to welcome everyone to the wednesday, may 4, 2016, Police Commission meeting i do have to start that meeting acknowledging the place were in as a city were here every once to do the work and there are still a lot of folks grieving and concerned and feeling like all the work were doing still isnt enough together is about continuing this work in actor and doing the work youll see the agenda from university of california, San Francisco to updates on collaborative reform to how were we keeping our streets save and the commission is doing the work and acknowledging there are a lot of folks still in pain and grieving and that for three and four no way just reaffirms
Undermine that would presumably been in the vacuums and thorough and exhaustive briefing this is legal and feasible and doable and an intent or distinct possibility but it is more of an afterthought as one potential argument why this is a problem and when he pressed the owner on this particular issue it was clear i dont know, there really see any real desire to do that development i dont see this is a situation are where the laboring are undermine the housing and clear to me this doesnt meet for the proponents of landmarking that stopping the development is not their goal there is no goal to develop that lot beyond what is there so im comfortable supporting this landmarking and ill make a motion to for the record that with a positive remedies. Supervisor peskin i was going to ask to associate myself with the finding made in the ordinance that is before us that was introduced by supervisor farrell and would add a friendly amendment it be sent as a report. He said that. That concludes my
And weve only just begun as a community to grapple with a world in which even nonstate actors will be able to get anything the internet. Second, the sizes of battlefields will expand. The proliferation of precision munitions and the isr network that supports employment are increasing the effective range of military units. Our adversaries will not only be able to get what they can see but also strike u. S. Forces actually over longer and longer distances. Third, concealing military forces will become more difficult. More actors are developing sophisticated capabilities designed to find and target their adversaries. On future battlefields find the enemy will be much easier than hiding from him. I believe these features are the operating environment, ubiquitous munitions, larger engagement zones a more transparent battlefields are clearly apparent today. For instance, the obvious hesitancy on the administrations part to assert freedom of navigation rights in the South China Sea in my mind
We are getting the organization used to a way of thinking. Its focusing on the security component and the effectiveness of that, defining that mission in a very clear way and looking to see what we are learns as we are studying it. Weve actually learned quite a bit already about system readiness both in the workforce as well as in the technology and its leading to things that we have to do to improve that on both scores, also beginning to point the way we are going to effect iively measure performan. I see this as a very valuable partnership even recognizing that they have to be independent, but they give me valuable information about how my system is working. Let me say this, one of the things that i pushed with the secret service and city police is i want them to create an organization which is the elite of the elite, in other words, a feeling that we are the best and that our standards are high and i believe that when you have when you get there, the people who are caught up in a cu
Hackers will get it and china will get it and we will be less safe. That leads me to a question about the use of encryption by the fbi. Are you encrypting all of your your agents,l of and personnel, and payroll, and systems . Data. We use encryption on a significant amount of data. Id like to follow up with that because i was stunned that the office of personnel did not have that important data encrypted. The federal government should protect itself by encrypting this data. We know that were being hacked constantly by state actors and the enemies of our country and im sure they would love to get data about the f. B. I. I look forward to hearing a greater details on them. I yield back, mr. Chairman. Recognize the gentleman from california mr. Issa for five minutes. Thank you, mr. Chairman. I have so many questions and so little time. Ill try to touch on each and bear with me. On sting rays, im going to ask you to tell us now or for the record how you control the access to these products