Not qualified to be president. I dont believe she is qualified if she is if she is through her super pac taking tens of millions of dollars in special interest fund. Kennedy you may not like that but its not a disqualifier in the sense one would be disqualified if they compromised national security. If you hadnt politically castrated yourself with the public affirmation of damn emails. Senator Sanders Campaign manager said something inflammatory on our air saying the clinton campaign, they need to be careful not to destroy the Democratic Party merely in pursuit of her own ambition to be president , very strong word. Your response to that idea. I mean its just ludicrous on the face of it. Kennedy no, madame secretary, this is ludicrous. After the fool, here is mrs. Clintons biggest worry about Bernie Sanders. Hes never even been a democrat by his own admission. Kennedy you mean hes not a member of the guilded country club you and your husband have been building the last 40 years . They
Not qualified to be president. I dont believe she is qualified if she is if she is through her super pac taking tens of millions of dollars in special interest fund. Kennedy you may notot like that but its not a disqualifier in the sense one would be disqualified if they compromised national security. If you hadnt politically castrated yourself with the public affirmation of damn emails. Senator Sanders Campaign manager said something inflammatory on our air saying thclinton campaign, they need to b be careful not to destroy e Democratic Party merely in pursuit of her own ambition to be president , very strong word. Your response to that idea. I mean its just ludicrous on the face of it. Kennedy n no, madame secretary, this is ludicrous. After the fool, here is mrs. Clintons biggest worry about Bernie Sanders. Hes never even been a democrat by his own admission. Kennedy you mean hes not a member of the guilded country club you and your husband have been building the last 40 years . The
To do this could actually stand up. And its my belief that it wont stand up, and it will leave more confusion and complexity than it will stability and finality despite that being what we were promised. I expect any result likely will be expected for repeal with the Supreme Court, and we have four minutes, probably, to wait to find out. Host when you were chairman of the fcc and working on the Net Neutrality issue, did you ever think it would be at the point that it is today . Guest no. In fact, the absolutely bipartisan, prevailing view at the time was way we were working on it wasnt called Net Neutrality then, but the commitment to the same open internet principles that garner attention today was it was an element of an unregulated infrastructure. It was an element of an infrastructure that not only guaranteed and promised end to end in innovative capacity, but one that also promised protection from an overreaching government. It was freedom for everybody from every source. You know,
Bipartisan prevailing view at the time was the way we were working on it was the commitment to the same open internet principles that garner attention today. It was an element of an unregulated infrastructure. It was an element of an infrastructure that not only guaranteed and promised innovative capacity that also promised protection from an overreaching government. It was freedom for everybody from every source. Replicatetended to the mob out ma bell regime. People have forgotten what was invoke in the late 1990s in a strong bipartisan way captured by the 1996 statute was a commitment to entangle a centurys worth of Communications Regulations built around railroads and ma bell. I dont think i could have envisioned in 2015 the spectacular result we have seen with internet growth as part of our country and economy, it would be the government impulse to return to the 19th century as a regulatory model. Peter joining our conversation is John Mckinnon who covers technology from the wall s
Eric talked about students switching majors and taking a long time as the cause of increasing student that when we visited and eight as pt of our heres a bit of what he had to say. But if you dig a little bit deeper, you see that there are really two problems that i think have an enormous impact. One of those is that we have too many students going into years five and six. And going years five and six borrowing money to do it. So they are not completing as fast as they can. A large number of them are students that are not as well off financially and what they end up doing is creating a cycle of working too many hours taking fewer classes perhaps not doing quite as well as their talent would allow because they are working. And then they go forward and take more time to graduate. Some of them give up. This is the group of people for which i believe we have too many people that dont complete. And then in years five and six they are borrowing more money because that is what it takes to get