will people city speaking french in montreal? yes. no doubt about it. no doubt about it. french first is something most would agree with. how far and how rigorously you want to go with that? well do you think there was ever any possibility or real majority or plurality of quebecois that would have voted in separate nation status? in english, you guys say timing is everything. timing was never better in the period 1990, 91, 92. in 95 this country came inches one being broken up. do you think it will ever happen? i don t know, but i know one thing, everyone who says separatism is dead in this country and this province is a fool. no matter how you feel about quebec as either separate from or as an essentially part of
party to be elected in 1976, it didn t come out of a vacuum. it came from a couple decades of awakening and struggle. will people city speaking french in montreal? yes. no doubt about it. no doubt about it. french first is something most would agree with. how far and how rigorously you want to go with that? well do you think there was ever any possibility or real majority or plurality of quebecois that would have voted in separate nation status? in english, you guys say timing is everything. timing was never better in the period 1990, 91, 92. in 95 this country came inches one being broken up. do you think it will ever happen? i don t know, but i know one thing, everyone who says
it came from a couple decades of awakening and struggle. will people city speaking french in montreal? yes. no doubt about it. no doubt about it. french first is something most would agree with. how far and how rigorously you want to go with that? well do you think there was ever any possibility or real majority or plurality of quebec dois that would have voted in separate nation status? in english, you guys say timing is everything. timing was never better in the period 1990, 91, 92. in 95 this country came inches one being broken up. do you think it will ever happen? i don t know, but i know one thing, everyone who says separatism is dead in this country and this province is a fool. no matter how you feel about quebec as either separate from
together. from there they split up and go in different directions which is typical of what happens with newly minted presidential or white house teams if you will. they head in different directions and cover different territories. paul ryan off to iowa which is looks to be yet again another battleground state in 2012. and he will be hitting the state fair which is an obvious opportunity for him to reach a whole lot of people across the state including folks that may not be inclined to vote for him. those folks will get a chance to hear him as well and i am sure he will draw a fairly large crowd. state which politics is by its very nature part of the culture out there because of its first in the nation status. paul ryan will be tested early on. the energy level in the campaign has been extraordinarily high but there is no indication as of yet there is still no polling numbers and we are only 24 hours into this in regards to how ryan impacts any of the
totally won, no tie, no split, nothing like that. rick santorum wins, so says the iowa republican party chairman on the radio until a press conference about an hour later. the one thing that we can t say is we do not have the certified we can t certify every precinct in the state. can we everybody say who the winner is or do we kind of put down an asterisk? that s a decision you have to make, and obviously, the campaigns and pundits will make their determinations on that. so the candidates and the pundits get to decide who won iowa. so says the iowa republican party, which runs the caucuses. tell me again why these guys in iowa are entrusted with the great honor and privilege, not to mention the monetary win fall that comes with first in the nation status. in 2008, the candidates are estimated to have spent $51 million in iowa. this time around, more than $12