t w ne: sn ur scario e. woulstil ene s i ower acio he ulil cod do seou i sff er est: aut wdide not nowco do whatilleapp s her t: w d at uotet mw atlpp abter thebank u m cris i fund itbhenk is f shoding,t thgh tt th ad ofho tg, -th t th ifou rd t arcle, he heof of t the oppitio nankif i rsd t saarng te,t hefhe h isppiogaink i saexpo ting l fr t h easndin that wod po brig nr ta $1 ill nat o for eri reblsnd iis1 llmilln r ebbarr is oil t he isll oppod beuse atrrhows il tthe wests ju itere ed i pobehee wsoil so tshe cou elfstju suain ire i of lsoeoufsun of eir of own..f r il:ut there nwn an we a. good to:he nan see a you.odo anagait seetar gase saud abiau.meetg wi anaiseareya ud a a al, anetoilwi presreurgi and alanl srginr and beflygi d t sin $10d bly 10barr. gaisat anrepo andrrhe u.s.ould he to ga drl sys a apond
any of the burdens. if you re going to take that position and say you want to be just a supporter, then you have to deal with the fact that in the international community, without american leadership, it is very complex. one of the reasons why the united states ends up taking the lead, say, in kosovo or in bosnia or in iraq or in afghanistan is because absent american leadership, these organizations often don t function. you know, one of the acronyms for nato is needs america to act or to operate, n-a-t-o. but right now they can t quite get it through nato because the united states isn t committing to its normal role as running the operation and bearing roughly half the costs and risks. let me ask you, the other day in el salvador, we had a news conference with the president, i asked him what the exit strategy was for the u.s. from this military action in libya. and essentially what he said is,