he s the one who prosecuted john edwards. he s got a political agenda.this i and this is all over presidential records act, which is a civil civil suit, a civil issue. issue,o is, they d they put out this narrative indictment. oh, this is a story of wrongdoing, national defense, and let s put an espionage. we got to tie it into russian collusion. so people say, oh, it could have been the russianspe. this is nonsense. and i want to know how many documents altered, how many documents were destroyed? zero zero. but who destroyed 33,000 documents that she lied about overn? d over agai hillary clinton. she destroyed them. that was tampering thatpering w obstruction of justice. and did the doj, the fbi, care ? they didn t give a damn, but now they care. what are they so afraid? n fo let him run for r office and ife he loses, then that s the end of it is thet i hate a country a is akin to a third world country. this is a banana republic. when indict one guy running forg president and the gu
well, first of all, john, to the extent we are told seven counts in the reporting last night, there are 38 counts, i believe, it s a 44-page indictment that we are all still scrolling through. what i would say about it so far is that like john turley, i have been saying all along i thought the obstruction was going to be the big kahuna here in the sense that what we understood about the facts they had issued former president trump a grand jury subpoena and they had caused, or he had caused, according to the theory, his lawyers to give false information to the fbi to be transmitted to the grand jury about whether he had turned over all the stuff in his possession. what i m struck by reading the indictment now, first of all, it s very detailed, it s a narrative indictment, it s not a
he is the one who prosecuted john edwards. he has a political agenda. and this is all over a presidential records act, which is a civil, civil suit, a civil issue, so what they do is they put out this narrative indictment, this is a story of wrongdoing, national defense, and let s put an espionage, tie it into the russia collusion, so people will say, oh, it could have been the russians. this is nonsense. and i want to know, how many documents were authored? how many documents were destroyed? zero, zero. but who destroyed 33,000 documents and she lied about over and over again? hillary clinton. she destroyed them. that was tampering with evidence. that was obstruction of justice. ended the doj, the fbi, they didn t give a damn. but now they care? what are they so afraid of? let him run for office and if he loses, that is the end of. hit a country that is akin to a third world country. this is a banana and public. when you indict one guy running