the presenter what next? here is the news from bethan holmes. the bbc director general tim davie is to face questions for the first time since an unnamed bbc presenter was accused by the sun newspaper of paying tens of thousands of pounds to a teenager for explicit photos. mr davie will answer questions at the unveiling of the corporation s yearly report. a lawyer representing the now 20 year old at the centre of the story says the allegations are rubbish but the sun says it s seen evidence to back the claims made by the young person s mum. mortgage costs have hit their highest level for 15 years after the rate on a twp year fixed deal surpassed the peak in the aftermath of the mini budget. the average rate on such a deal is now over 6.6% a level not seen since august 2008 and the financial crisis. mps are to vote on changes to the illegal migration bill. amendments put forward by ministers include limits on the detention of unaccompanied children who will be gr
the young person had come to them with a slightly alternative account, saying there was nothing illegal or inappropriate, they would have been morally bound, duty bound, to have put that in the article. without naming them, but so and so denies the story, the young person is saying this. that is part of proper reporting, isn t it? reporting, isn t it? yes, ithink so. i reporting, isn t it? yes, ithink so- idont reporting, isn t it? yes, ithink so. i don t know reporting, isn t it? yes, ithink so. i don t know the reporting, isn t it? yes, i think- so. i don t know the circumstances of how that happened on the night, i have to say. maybe it is something that the sun should mention. it is now known, their business letter, it is out there. what i think we have to be careful about is to avoid turning this down the alley by the
last to ratify the martin lives a king federal holiday, or to act on it. she now faces having that kind of a role in history. on national voting rights, in a way that maybe didn t feel right to her, that it does now. as where she stands, as we are less than a week out from the mlk day. that being the deadline by which democrats want to get this done. you made that point about senator sinema in one of our discussions recently today speech by joe biden, named donald trump specified him. all of the problems that he represents in what has happened to voting rights and his lying. but he is doing. trying to force a republican state legislature. but without naming them, president biden repeatedly put all of the pressure of his jury repeatedly on these two democratic senators. they have not had that moment before. so tonight, they are senator
the martin luther king jr. holiday redux in the say way her state was the last state to ratify the martin luther king jr. federal holiday or to act on it. she now faces having that kind of a role in history on national voting rights in a way that maybe didn t feel right to her until it does now. that s where she stands as we re less than a woke out from the mlk day and the deadline democrats want to get this done. you made that point about senator sinema in a discussion recently. today s speech by joe biden owe named donald trump, specified him and all of the problems that he represents and what has happened to voting rights and his lying and what he is doing and what he is trying to force and republicans state legislatures are doing. but without naming them, president biden repeatedly put all of the pressure of history, repeatedly, on these two democratic senators, and they have not had that moment before.
again, s.w.i.f.t. is not some panacea. it s a messaging, communication system. there s other ways to make payment. what some people are worried about is if this sanction with s.w.i.f.t. would released, it would accelerate a global payment system and we would have less influence. again, though, i understand the focus on sanctions but there s nothing in the history of sanctions that suggest that even if we could get greater consensus or resolve that we seem to have that somehow that s the silver bullet. there s just nothing in history that suggests that. hillary clinton called out, without naming them, former president trump and mike pompeo