wrong, too. and if you think the private one is okay, then having an official position can t be any worse than that. so again, he s hoisted by his own petard. can we asha, can we agree there were a number of people on that call most likely? yes. okay. there s one call. the complaint encompasses more than the call. you know that, right? the president of the united states knows that all those people are on the telephone call. we talking about the conduct of the president of the united states. then let s see it. show me the money, man. where s the beef? let s see it. the most transparent administration ever. turn over the transcript of the call. turn over the whistleblower complaint. if you have nothing to hide, don t hide. and, jimmy, to your point, he also knew he was standing next to the head you also knew where he was standing today, next to a guy who was trying to break down on press ratings and decided to denigrate the american media.
says this man and others were trying to hurt trump in the 2016 campaign. leshchenko says, no, i was trying to root out corruption in my country. giuliani says, oh, yeah, then why were you convicted of making it up about manafort? giuliani s making that up. that case went away and you just heard it from the man who is there and you can google it and you ll find the procedural history on the case. and then giuliani says, yeah, but look, biden wanted to get rid of this prosecutor who was coming after his kid. that makes sense to all of us, right? that would make sense. except this guy, they wanted him out, his own party, 298 or 89 votes in the parliament to get him out. western democracies wanting had imou him out, the u.n. wanted hem imt because he wouldn t take up cases. no evidence he took up cases against hunter biden.
he discussed joe biden in a call with ukraine s president is only adding to democrats case for potential impeachment. and his loyal lawyer today once again didn t seem to help the case. did the president threaten to cut off aid to the ukraine? no. that was a false story. 100%? i can t tell you if it s 100%. there is a game afoot but sometimes this man is just not on his game. it s a false story but you can t say that it s 100% untrue? either he was playing with the aide or he wasn t. let s bring in cuomo s court, asha rangappa, let s cut through to the practicalities. other than this is congress s job, what i don t understand is where does this go?
agent named greenwood and they found him guilty of that. nobody reports that. if you re going to put somebody at the center of your theory, know their name, okay? the man s name is serh serhi lashenko, a former member of that country s parliament. we spoke exclusively with him tonight and we covered a lot of turf, including what mr. jewel a giuliani just left out. this was a decision of administrative court in ukraine, which was never in active status because we went it appeal court, which stopped and then cancelled the decision of the administrative court and for today there is no decision stating that i violated any law in sense of intervention in america elections or something like that.
. again, impeach, not impeach, it s a political consideration, i m going to\people about that tonight. for us it s about whether or not people in power are telling you the truth, and rudy giuliani was not telling you the truth on things that matter. so we wanted to check the holes in the president s theory several times on this show. it s not just about the biden family, it about other things that rudy giuliani s calling out and we went to the source. december 16th, 2018 there is a finding by a court in the ukraine that a man named teleshenco, something like that, that he produced a phony affidavit that was given to the american authorities and an fbi