authority to an administrative agency to make the decision that they re gonna act on these major questions. congress must specifically delegate authority to address that particular question, here student loan relief, to the administrative agency. but the question of what is a major question is ultimately a question that can only be answered by this court. so in this this decision and in through three creative, the person who is one here is this institution. the court that gets to say what is speech what is a major question, and what is the extent of their impact on their lives. it was good to say to mark s point, which is a sad final summer you here, it seems that the supreme court is legislating these issues. you had an affirmative action case brought by billionaires, you had the student loan forgiveness case, not broad for advice students, and in both cases the supreme court is making a decision that affects millions. melissa murray, thank you so much. mark joseph stern, thank you
court. and this is only the beginning of this new line of presidents. we will see how far it will balance. but this is the dawn of a new era in politics. did you want to say anything in response? mark said something that s interesting here in a goes to the question of what s expressive conduct. ultimately in this, opinion five of his colleagues thinks is expressive. and that s another theme that you see in the student loan cases as well. they are the court says, where there is an issue of major salient, a major question so to speak, it is not up to congress to simply delegate that authority to an administrative agency to make the decision that they re gonna act on these major questions. congress must specifically delegate authority to address that particular question, here student loan relief, to the administrative agency. but the question of what is a major question is ultimately a question that can only be answered by this court. so in this this decision and in through three cr
had a first amendment right for refusing to design websites for same-sex couples.we designer wh she had a first amendment right for refusing to design websites for same-sex couples.b designer she had a first amendment right for refusing to design websites for same-sex couples. at the heart of the case they said was a man, identified as i stuart. cnn tracked down stuart, who asked that his last name not be used. and he claims he never requested the web designer make anything for any wedding. he says he doesn t have a fiance named mike and that he s already married to a woman and has been for 15 years. stuart, who i should note used to work for cnn, is also a web designer and said no one connected with the case has ever reached out to him until the other day. he was even unaware of his information being part of this until he was contacted by the media outlet, new republic. a lawyer for the other side said this is all irrelevant to the case and the ruling that happened today. but it certa
laurie smith s lawyers argued in a brief to the tenth circuit court of appeals that she had received a request from a prospective customer named stewart, inquiring about a celebrated celebrate his wedding tsv on say, a person named mike. this week, supreme court justices were sent to decide whether lorries missed should be able to turn someone like that alleged perspective customer name stewart, turned him away. a reporter decided to get his contact information from the publicly bailable filing. and reach out to him, to hear what he has to say. find out what was going on. what he had to say was actually startling. still claimed he never sent that inquiry. at the time it was sent, he was married to a woman. quote, i m married, i have a child. i m not really sure where that came from. but somebody is using false information in a supreme court filing document. he also questioned why he, a web designer, living in san francisco, would seek to hire someone in another state who is never built
shares a story from wherever, i judge it, vote on the winner and something happens. you know, i m going you seem pretty excited kat kat: i am. greg: why don t you go first kat: midwest news baby. greg: yeah? what happened? kat: the corn in iowa is okay! [cheers and applause] kat: yeah. greg: wait, we have footage of the corn kat: no, no, no. do not demean this like some big city metropolitan guy, okay? it was a dry climate. they were thinking maybe the corn s not going to be okay. and, you know what? it is! all the sweet corn, the sweet corn is okay. but, you know, you thinking you re out of the woods you re not. a local farmer named mike from des moines who says he s more concerned about the next harvest which, by the way, is going to be in late august. and so i just think that we all need to keep in in our hearts and our minds and our thoughts andly keep everybody updated