chairman nadler hasn t said that definitively. to the extent that the president continues to withhold documents, withhold information, withhold individuals such as mick mulvaney or mike pompeo or john bolton from testifying, it very well may be the last hearing. if it s the last hearing you want to vote in the judiciary committee on articles of impeachment when, thursday or friday? that s possible. but again, the schedule hasn t been set. we re going to continue to proceed expeditiously because this does relate to a matter of urgent national concern as members who have been appointed by trump, for instance, inspector general to the intelligence committee have indicated. assuming you approve the articles of impeachment it goes to the full house next week? that would be correct to the extent that that decision is made. it may go to the house of representatives in terms of the floor next week, but that s a leadership decision led by speaker pelosi. you re a leader. that s corr
it s going to be solemn, written for the history books and the whole dynamic is going to change. and all this business, we re going to invite all these thugs from ukraine to be witnesses. it s not going to happen. so why do you think why doesn t it explicitly say they re not going to participate? it just says it should be called off, it s a charade, it s a sham. those are the buzz words they re using. because they want to leave it open and fox news won t make the distinction you just did. i m sorry? that s a good point. listen, the president tweeted this out. it says nadler hasn t had a single fact witness testify, zero substance. judiciary has only had one hearing, and is the president forgetting that he blocked his closest aides from testifying? you re saying he hasn t had one fact witness. he blocked everybody.
make that distinction that you did. i m sorry? that s a good point. president tweeted this out. nadler hasn t had a single fact witness testify, zero substance. judiciary had one hearing. and is the president forgetting he blocked his closest aids from testifying. he hasn t had one fact witness. he blocked everybody. this is a strategy. you say okay you re not doing this fairly. people aren t testifying. let them testify. we can t have that. as everyone here is noted this is about obstruction, about muddying the waters and confusing people. there isn t a great defense. facts aren t really in dispute. and probably the what we re doing is distracting and they re doing it well.
articles of impeachment would be a reckless abuse of power. and constitute the highly partisan and unconstitutional attempt at impeachment. nadler responded immediately in a statement. if the president has no good response to the allegations, then he would not want to appear before the committee. having declined the opportunity he cannot claim the process is unfair. and house intel chairman schiff saying the white house said they want an open hearings. now closed. and then they didn t want those either. then said they wanted to participate in the proceedings and now they say they don t. all they really want is hide the president s serious miskulkt. it s not working. the house speaker undaunted by the house. said this. last night. acts are clear the
anything like it. it s a long way from when people were rooting for a recession because they thought they could maybe win an election. but we don t root for a recession. we root for success. and we re having tremendous success. yeah, so you re rooting for success. well, the other thing we ve been covering this week is what s gone on with impeachment where there is no rooting for success. nancy tells us she s prayerful about it, she s pay patriotic t it while the president takes a different view and rightfully so. this is what he s tweeted. he wrote nadler hasn t had a single fact witness testify, zero substance, country wants usmca and growth, not impeachment, polls have tanked on the do-nothing democrats. it raises the point, not only have they not advanced key pieces of legislation, but the polls in early states are showing that either voters