In Yegiazaryan v. Smagin, the Supreme Court of the United States built upon its decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, which concerned whether the Racketeer Influenced and.
On June 29th, the Supreme Court decided whether two provisions of the Lanham Act, specifically 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a) and § 1125(a)(1) protect domestic trademark holders from.
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court decided Abitron Austria GMBH v. Hetronic Int’l, Inc., No. 21-1043, addressing the extraterritoriality of the Lanham Act. The Court held that.
The Supreme Court of the United States recently considered whether portions of the Lanham Act that relate to trademark infringement can be applied to conduct that takes place outside.
Introduction On June 22, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Yegiazaryan v. Smagin, No. 22 381, affirming the Ninth Circuit s holding that allowed a foreign plaintiff to sue under the.