Neighborhood quality of life services. Now fiscal feasibility. There are five requirements of fiscal feasible. Looks at direct and indirect economic benefits of project, proposed Construction Costs, proposed funding, operation and maintenance costs and proposal to use public debt. In fiscal feasibility report and numbers we generated with help of eps and barrett, we did use conservative assumptions. If you have questions about the number of assumptions, i have jim mussbach and Richard Burton from eps to talk through them. First the economic benefits. There are two sources. Some is annual unrestricted general fund and other is dedicated or unrestricted revenue. Approximately 12 million in annual unrestricted general fund revenue from sources you see in this chart expected from the development at the two sites. The initial number that was generated in fiscal feasibility report used pay roll tax. We will have gross receipts tax by the time arena is completed. The number has been adjust so
That debt. That is something we will discuss with director of Public Finance and others who work on finance in the city. I think jennifer has talked a lot about the project financing that we will address through the pro forma analysis and discuss what the city is obliged to repay and community benefits. How specifically is city through the term sheet with warriors establishing a way to pay for police, neighborhood cleanup and additional transit service. Those have to be answered in the term sheet. After the term sheet is approved, it would be endorsed by the Port Commission and board of supervisors. It is nonbinding, reflects intention of parties headed into Environmental Review. During the period of Environmental Review city staff would negotiate a more detailed set of transaction documents governing the sale of seawall lot 30 and longterm lease of piers 3032 and those would be subject to both Port Commission approval and board of supervisors approval. That is expected in early 2014.