jurors say, well, he s indicted. the prosecution and the police believe he did it. let s find out how guilty he is. what i had to show the most was scientific fact that he could not have done it. the attorney began his argument at the crime scene itself where the defense claimed the detective who so meticulously went over every piece of evidence collected there failed to come up with anything, not so much as a fingerprint or a fiber to connect ed ates to the crime. you re going to see a lot of what i call hm, well, that s interesting, what about that ? but not one of those makes up beyond a reasonable doubt. wouldn t you think he would have asked that an eyewitness would have remembered a strange 300-pound man lumbering away in broad daylight? the attorney did point out something a young neighbor had seen. a mystery woman inside a green van park behind the victim s home. and there was a green van
the prosecution and the police believe he did it. let s find out how guilty he is. what i had to show the most was scientific fact that he could not have done it. the attorney began his argument at the crime scene itself where the defense claimed the detective so meticulously went over every piece of evidence collected there failed to come up with anything, not so much as a fingerprint or fiber to connect ed ates to the crime. you re going to see a lot of what i call hum. well, that s interesting. what about that? but not one of those makes up beyond a reasonable doubt. wouldn t you think he would have asked that an eyewitness would have remembered a strange 300-pound man lumbering away in broad daylight? the attorney did point out something a young neighbor had seen. a mystery woman inside a green van park behind the victim s home. and there was a green van
there failed to come up with anything, not so much as a fingerprint or a fiber to connect ed ates to the crime. you re going to see a lot of what i call hum. well, that s interesting. what about that? but not one of those makes up beyond a reasonable doubt. wouldn t you think he would have asked that an eyewitness would have remembered a strange 300-pound man lumbering away in broad daylight? the attorney did point out something a young neighbor had seen. a mystery woman inside a green van park behind the victim s home. and there was a green van driven by a woman that the children saw there for over an hour and they never found it. i don t know if they looked for it. but it certainly had nothing to do with ed ates. was that a red herring to you or interesting to you? it was very interesting. that probably was the murderer. that probably had something to do with it. driven by a woman and yet, every woman ed ates knows was
what i had to show the most was scientific fact that he could not have done it. the attorney began his argument at the crime scene itself where the defense claimed the detective who so meticulously went over every piece of evidence collected there failed to come up with not so much as a fingerprint or a fiber to connect ed ates to the crime. you re going to see a lot of what i call hum. well, that s interesting. what about that? but not one of those makes up beyond a reasonable doubt. wouldn t you think he would have asked that an eyewitness would have remembered a strange 300-pound man lumbering away in broad daylight? the attorney did point out something a young neighbor had seen. a mystery woman inside a green van park behind the