. if hillary clinton runs in 2016, she s going to have a hard time proving she can get thatun wake-up call at 3:00 a.m. and answer the phone. yesterday i showed you my version of an ad that any 2016 hillary competitor should run. it s 3:00 a.m. and your children are safe and asleep. who do you want answering the phone? i m hillary clinton. and i approve this message. what difference at this point does it make? today the super pac run by karl rove released their version.d go. a 22 year diplomatic veteran intimidated for daring to blow the whistle. while under hillary clinton s watch. how could this happen? why did she blame a video? was she part of a cover-up? was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they would go kill some americans? what difference at this point does it make?
maybe they needed that background briefing. nice point. eric,ov what do you think? disaster tore them? very importantly. the first sound bite you rolled, jay carney said, we changed one point. can i hold this up? he said he changed consulate to diplomatic facilities. but importantly, he said, the white house and the state t department made one change. this is what they said they did. this ist what we found out they did. look at that. not onehi word, but 147 words is what they eliminated. it wasn t one thing. it s notten edit. it s massacre. jay carney doubled down again today and said the white house made the change, but another time in that press conference, he said the white house and the made oneartment change. it s an abject lie and frankly sick of the political leaps thinking we re dumb enough to buy into this bs. they are lying to the american people. they made a lot of changes directly from victoria nuland who was hillary clinton s spokesperson at the state
he was abused as a child and therefore, he now playing this out in his adulthood. he says when the cops came by at some point, i think back in 04,2 he s a school bus driver action he left the child in the bus. he said anything that hangs give myth money to these wait a t second. is that a good defense? the whole point of this is that he left a note, could be a suicide note or apology note from 2004, nine years ago. i mean, it just looks like he whenever he got caught, he was going to try and make it a little bit better. let s ask the lawyer in the house. that can be used against him in a court of law because that s an admission. handwriting, they can authenticate it. they re going to file a death penalty case against him. this is whatnc we talked aboutn even back in the wednesday onke the show. and this is no surprise. the initial reports are coming out from the f.b.i. that this
the five. it is? i think i agree with you. there you go. i m serious. i think the media you ve done that twice today. it must be the drink. polling has an affect on me. i think the media should havee. been on this story earlier and i think the transparency is you got to demand that they produce the documents, give youce everything up front. i understand that you re dealing with the c.i.a., you re dealing with defense intelligence, okay. but at some point given that there were the deaths involved,y i think the media has the responsibility to go hard at this story, to be an absolute pit bull. you talk about a watchdog, be a pit bull because you know what? i disagree with my colleagues here. i don t think there is anybody prven to be involved in lies and conspiracies. but the media, wow. why aren t you out there pursuing the damn story? weigh. wait a minute, if you just said why wouldn t they pursue the lies lies and conspiracy? if you show it to me, if you. show m
was exactly what was going on there. this was systematic what he was doing. the good news is the law in ohio is not going to allow this. the law is not going to protect ariel castro. that s the important point here and other states should have these laws on the books where 20 weeks, viability, et cetera, all this is going to factor into thg prosecution here because i think it s a shame that in this country, you can t get the death penalty for repeatedly sexually abusing and raping and torturing children. can you believe that? is there a distinction to be> made between bringing the deathi penalty because of these forced abortions as opposed to having kidnapped and tortured these women? they were children at the time. they were still under the age of 18. so that s mybe point. we shoulde. change the law. eliminate the abortion point i do believe that. having done these case, it s horrific. these guys are reside advices and they can t stop.