supposed to do. congress has decided what it is that a judge has to do in this and any other case when they sentence. and that statute that statute doesn t say look only at the guidelines and stop. the statute doesn t say impose the highest possible penalty for this sickening and egregious crime. the statute says calculate the guidelines, but also look at various aspects of this offense and impose a sentence that is, quote, sufficient but not greater than necessary to promote the purposes of punishment. and in every case when i am dealing with something like this, it is important to me to make sure that the children s perspective and the children s voices are represented in my
0 misleading the public but taking the court out of context. she repeated testimony from someone else and he says it is her quote. hawley praised her experience and said he looks forward to questioning her today. also important to note many questions about her time as a public defender and for her to get on the bench this time where she was now at the court of appeals three republicans, murcowski, collins and graham all voted in favor. we ll see what they do this time. trace: david spunt live at the justice department. dana: two fox news contributors. andy mccarthy and constitutional law attorney jonathan turley. we have gone through this a few times together. one of the things i was thinking about is how different some of these hearings are when it is a democratic nominee versus a republican nominee. you posted a column in usa today saying ketanji brown jackson is getting the respect amy coney barrett was denied. the republicans say they will keep it civil. the democrats will alre