that had been concealed. barra mcgrory, a former director of public prosecutions in northern ireland, was among those integral to the setting up of operation kenova. the decision to prosecute any criminal charge is one for the director of public prosecutions, and the director of public prosecutions alone. in the wake of the sandy lynch episode, a decision to prosecute those arrested was taken in the absence of all relevant material. information and material which was integral to the events, which should have been before the then director of public prosecutions, who was sir alasdair fraser qc, my predecessor, was withheld from the director. and which, had it been made available to him, would most likely have led
that had been concealed. barra mcgrory, a former director of public prosecutions in northern ireland, was among those integral to the setting up of operation kenova. the decision to prosecute any criminal charge is one for the director of public prosecutions, and the director of public prosecutions alone. in the wake of the sandy lynch episode, a decision to prosecute those arrested was taken in the absence of all relevant material. information and material which was integral to the events, which should have been before the then director of public prosecutions, who was sir alasdair fraser qc, my predecessor, was withheld from the director. and which, had it been made available to him, would most likely have led the then director to the conclusion
first, i think you have confirmed what i was implying in first, i think you have confirmed what i was implying in my- first, i think you have confirmedi what i was implying in my earlier answer what i was implying in my earlier answer which what i was implying in my earlier answer which was what i was implying in my earlier answer which was taking - what i was implying in my earlier answer which was taking that - answer which was taking that iegisiation answer which was taking that legislation forward answer which was taking that legislation forward rapidly, i answer which was taking that i legislation forward rapidly, the minimum legislation forward rapidly, the minimum service legislation forward rapidly, the minimum service levels- legislation forward rapidly, the minimum service levels of- minimum service levels of legislation, minimum service levels of legislation, was minimum service levels of legislation, was not- minimum service levels of legislation, was not be
talking about? what am i telling you this? you are right. but they don t care who the president is. what is it like for them? let me put this to you first and then hear your thoughts. to have a president say i didn t believe the intelligence community assessment on russia when it was run by my predecessor s appointees but i believe them now when they said the same thing. it s disturbing. a lot of people work in the intelligence community are republicans. and a lot of them find a lot to like in donald trump s, for example, counterterrorism policies and some of the ways he s deploying the intelligence community around the world. but they re just beside themselves about his approach to this whole russia issue and to juan s point, we really have to start to question now whether this is political or something else. he s clearly trying to delegitimize the mueller investigation. muddy the waters about this question wof whether russia interfered. mueller is looking at in terms of whether
we also through the traditional informant types of information that s with the joint terrorism task force and the fbi is so essential. the idea that you start building a case that something is percolating. there s been a number of those types of incidences where we start watching the ripples, if you will, spreading out. so once again, john is correct. in new york my predecessor built the foundation. and we saw resent events their ability to pull off a bomb in a plane zplchlt isis is a greater