political activeism that hurts voting rights? i think that based upon the court decisions as i ve seen them, as i ve read them, it is interpretation of the law. my view is, we ought not have a court in which you can determine whether the justices appointed by a republican or democrat president, they ought to specifically interpret the words of the law, the words of the constitution as best they can, as best as they understand them, and if there s some doubt about those words, look to the intent and when we get a result that we don t like, and clearly i ve lived through courts in which i have significant disagreements with their decisions, including this court, but the results shouldn t be that we have an uproar about the supreme court and adding more justices. it should be that we re going to work to make the laws better. you can come to congress and lobby. the last thing we need is for the court to be a legislative body. that s what congress is. that s what the constitution outlines
doing is celebrating the constitution of the united states and the freedoms and liberties it provides and we ought to be celebrating an independent court that makes decisions based upon the words of the constitution and based upon the statute that congress passes. when we don t get the result we want from a court, the response should not be let s put a bunch more justices of on the court. the response should be we honor the fact we live in a country with the rule of law. griff: your colleagues on the other side of the aisle, democrats by and large, it wasn t just president biden, also speaker pelosi said that justices ruled in a way that was an you assault on democrat an assault on democracy. and particularly the rulings specifically the rulings the democrats are upset about, one in arizona upholding one about a ban on ballot harvesting, the other striking down a law in california over forces nonprofits to disclose their largest donors. what do you say to democrat colleagues that s
responsibilities. and the supreme court and our justice system has nothing more to do in these circumstances except to interpret the law even when we get a result that we may not like. if you don t like the interpretation of the supreme court, come back to congress and ask us to modify the law so they re acceptable under the constitution or the law cans be interpreted as they they were intended. he s he personally on end pens day especially on independence day, this isn t the time to criticize the court. we can criticize the decision but the justices are doing their jobs. griff: to americans understand, the court currently is a 6-3 makeup, favoring conservatives. to turn that over of, would you have to add four, you can t add do or three, you would only get a tie, you would have to add four and to get there you would have to end the filibuster. how likely is that to happen under this current administration that we will see the return of the filibuster overturning of the filibuste
difficult is that? because you guys already have the most difficult, precise training and maneuvers. how much more challenges dust add to have the new plane? we had a transition team that was stood up for several years, going through the unique differences of the super hornet. so they they were former blue angels that flew the aircraft and we have a very extensive winter training syllabus, over 120 training flights that we do out in california before we start the show season. so due to covid, and the loss of a season last year, all of our air shows were canceled. we actually froze the team. so all the demonstration pilots are returning so it really helped the transition that we had an experienced team, an experienced crew of maintainers to unveil the new flat. howie: platform and plat platform and we absolutely love it. griff: my mother-in-law ran an air show in pennsylvania where
their operatives, there senate, their staffers, all skimming around in the shadows. they have come up with literally nothing tangible or concrete. the reason why they blowp this off, it is not a court of law, because that is how totalitarians think. and so, you have people who make accusations this isn t about women s rights. itit is not even about women. there are millions and millions of women out there many of them watching your show. my wife, my mother, my daughter, mymyht stepdaughter,y mother-in-law and so forth who don t believe in this. there are tens of thousands of women who find this entire spectacle it s not a hearing, it is a roman colosseum peered there throwing them to the lions. liberals don t speak to women.h did bill clinton speak for all the women he sexually assaulted? i don t think so. people keep saying brett kavanaugh had six fbi background investigations. how many background investigations did ms. ford have? zero. what about the other accusers? how many back