friend is talking about high crown magistrates and government officials, this isn t a miss sieve from the government that is clear this is a government person. you have an investigation and seek testimony to see who was in the meeting and what they knew, not jump to the conclusion he knew it was the government of russia. i think everyone reading the e-mail knows it was russian-based. so mustafa, respond to that one. it is absolutely ludicrous to say, forget about being a campaign professional and being in politics. as an american, if someone says the russian government has information about your opponent and we want to give it to you to support your father s bid for the president of the united states. if you are a base level human being with basic understanding of life, you know that s a problem. the response you get from don junior, i love it, maybe we should release it. he does know what s going on. he understands the timing of a
tucker: mustafa tameez is a democratic strategist and former consultant for the department of homeland security. thanks a lot for coming on. all the focus has been on the president s motives in this. what does he really mean, what does he desire personally?ir i guess i would say, that is unknowable, as it always is, with people s motives. the question is, does the country deserve a higher level of protection in light of what we are watching happened in europe? i don t see how we don t deserve that. no, i agree with you that wei need a higher level of protection, especially nowadays. but we have to identify where the threat is. as charles was saying, many ofhe these radicals are homegrown, meaning that they are not coming from somewhere else, they are grown within this countrieses. these countries. we have to counter violentnt extremism, make sure that the isis narrative of a class of civilization is not the one that we adopt, you are right, nobody knows president trump s motives.