opinions. but juries have to be unanimous. you can become the leader of the free world with less than 50% of the votes but you cannot be convicted even of jaywalking without the full agreement of your fellow citizens. pundits critique the lawyers the defendant s testimony on the witness stand and judge cliff newman s evidentiary rulings. i thought judge newman did an outstanding job under very difficult circumstances. the lawyers on both sides enjoyed good reputations but cases are really won or lost because of judges or lawyers. is the evidence injuries a focus on for it i said i would rather have a false exculpatory statement that a confession. and now you see why. a light you can prove will seal a defendant s fate quicker than any other type of evidence of previous alex murdaugh lie about not being present at the murder scene that did him in. for all of the forensics and ballistics in gunshot revenue, blood splatter, the phone, navigation data it was a lie. it exposed him
he could have reached into his pocket with the blood on his hands other gloves still in his pocket will have residue on them will have dna. probably have an outcome similar to what you just talked about with the murdaugh trial. looks just like the murdaugh trial investigations are ong ongoing. just because there is an indictment or just because there is interest the cops don t stop. they do not stop for two reasons. you may find something really relevant but whether you do or not the defense attorneys are going to ask why you didn t do the following. so, let our viewers have a sense of what it is like to investigate a crime scene you have to do everything because you re going to be asked about it. you are exactly right to ray. i would always when i called drop the dominoes. 5a piece of information i would do just as you said, what would they ask us on the stand? those of us have been skewered