correct? we do. and so, you know, there are excellent reasons. we clearly have jurisdiction. the international argue. is straightforward, too. that is that this person has committed terrible crimes. they are clearly terrorist acts. there are crimes against humanity. and, therefore, he can be prosecuted anywhere under the universalist principle. bill: i got it here is the rub. qaddafi knows qaddafi isn t like mumbarak. nobody is going to bother mumbarak, i don t think. mumbarak is down some place. he has got his money stashed somewhere. the world will probably forget him like he had did e.d. emean. he is probably going to hang on in libya as long as he can hundreds of more people maybe thousands will die because he knows he has got nowhere to go. that s a pretty good argument for international team for going to in and grabbing them. going in and getting him right now. there is a precedent in this case. let s be clear megrahi was
states. not in some international court and definitely not in england. bill: why do you think the president aside from the american presence in libya isn t more forceful against qaddafi and mumbarak in egypt. i think qaddafi mumbarak may be more complications. qaddafi is a clean cut situation. qaddafi is more like my lois very much or osama bin laden. he has been frozen to be behind the murder of american citizens. he attacked an american plane. you can t say about the same about mumbarak. you can t each say the same about saddam hussein. this is a guy who is a clear-cut enemy of the united states. what he should come out and say right now is to the people of libya that qaddafi is an enemy of the united states and we support you in your efforts. to give them some of the momentum that they may need right now during these desperate times. bill: even knowing the americans, you know, you have to start to step up. now, mr. conaway i would like to
states. not in some international court and definitely not in england. bill: why do you think the president aside from the american presence in libya isn t more forceful against qaddafi and mumbarak in egypt. i think qaddafi mumbarak may be more complications. qaddafi is a clean cut situation. qaddafi is more like my lois very much or osama bin laden. he has been frozen to be behind the murder of american citizens. he attacked an american plane. you can t say about the same about mumbarak. you can t each say the same about saddam hussein. this is a guy who is a clear-cut enemy of the united states. what he should come out and say right now is to the people of libya that qaddafi is an enemy of the united states and we support you in your efforts. to give them some of the momentum that they may need right now during these desperate times. bill: even knowing the americans, you know, you have to start to step up. now, mr. conaway i would like to
correct? we do. and so, you know, there are excellent reasons. we clearly have jurisdiction. the international argue. is straightforward, too. that is that this person has committed terrible crimes. they are clearly terrorist acts. there are crimes against humanity. and, therefore, he can be prosecuted anywhere under the universalist principle. bill: i got it here is the rub. qaddafi knows qaddafi isn t like mumbarak. nobody is going to bother mumbarak, i don t think. mumbarak is down some place. he has got his money stashed somewhere. the world will probably forget him like he had did e.d. emean. he is probably going to hang on in libya as long as he can hundreds of more people maybe thousands will die because he knows he has got nowhere to go. that s a pretty good argument for international team for going to in and grabbing them. going in and getting him right now. there is a precedent in this case. let s be clear megrahi was
think president obama is going to have a hard time with this. this guy is a terrorist. he is a killer. mumbarak is probably a killer but mumbarak, they are not going to chase him down. he has done too much for the united states. let him go wherever is he going. gaddafi i think they have got to try him and throw him into guantanamo bay bay or something, am i wrong. when you and ralph peters say that you find the president very bright. i m sorry, i started off with that but i have a different definition to really bright is somebody who exhibits bright judgments. and i m a couple years in with this guy now i m not sure he is serviceably bright i m not sure is he very bright anymore. this is a bad man here. you have a chance to make a statement to bad guys all over the world. and we re in a comedy of manners with him. it s sort of mincing. i think he should find gaddafi. i agree with you. i think it would be great if he is going to keep guantanamo bay open and-to-send him there and have